晨报副刊与近代集团化知识分子的聚合及分化
发布时间：2019-04-02 14:47
【摘要】：科举制度被废除后,中国传统士大夫入仕参政的人生道路被阻断。在新的历史语境下,知识分子们必须重新规划人生道路,他们不再将自己的人生理想寄托于庙堂,转而走向民间,有的办起了学校、有的从事出版,也有一些开始了办报活动。这些活动的开展使知识分子们开始具有自己独立的品格和价值判断。《晨报副刊》即是在这样的背景下诞生。 从1919年2月《晨报副刊》改版开始至1926年徐志摩离开《晨报副刊》,在这7年的时间里,《晨报副刊》先后经历了三大主编。在不同主编主持期间,《晨报副刊》呈现出的精神面貌也是不同,直至三大主编先后离开。到底当初这些知识分子们是为何集结在《晨报副刊》周围,后来又是什么原因导致他们分道扬镳?本文共分四章,旨在这些方面进行相关探讨。 第一章为文章的基础和铺垫。在此将交代自1905年废除科举制度以后,传统知识分子们狭窄的生存空间和现实处境。说明知识分子是为何集结,他们集结办报时的社会背景。还将交代知识分子们是如何对办报空间进行建构的。 在第二章中,将视角对准李大钊、孙伏园、徐志摩三大主编以及聚集在他们周围的知识分子们是如何在《晨报副刊》的平台上“发声”、“立言”,通过对《晨报副刊》传播内容的定量分析和历任主编的交际圈的解读,说明《晨报副刊》与知识分子们的聚合是什么原因。 第三章通过对《晨报副刊》历任三大主编报刊思想、编辑特色的分析以及对围绕在《晨报副刊》周围的知识分子们的“后台景观”的呈现,揭示出李大钊、孙伏园、徐志摩先后离开《晨报副刊》的深层次原因。 第四章是文章的总结和升华。论证近代政党化知识分子围绕在《晨报副刊》周围是出于办报立言的初衷,而一旦“立言”与《晨报》总编辑办报思想相冲突,由于近代知识分子自我意识的觉醒,他们将会寻找下一个可以“发声”的舆论舞台,而绝不听之任之。 通过对《晨报副刊》及历任三大主编报刊思想的分析,可以总结出在特定的社会历史条件及政治环境下,包括副刊在内的媒介通过自身有意识、有倾向的传播,可以发挥自身独特的舆论动员作用来促进社会的进步,而社会大环境反过来又促进了媒介的改革。
[Abstract]:After the abolishment of the imperial examination system, the life path of Chinese traditional scholar-bureaucrats to participate in politics was blocked. In the new historical context, intellectuals must replan their life paths. Instead of pinning their life ideals in temples and halls, they have moved towards the people. Some have set up schools, some have engaged in publishing, and some have begun to run newspapers. These activities made intellectuals begin to have their own independent character and value judgment. The Morning Post Supplement was born in this context. From February 1919 to 1926, Xu Zhimo left the Morning Post Supplement. In these seven years, the Morning Post Supplement has experienced three major editors-in-chief. During the period of different editors-in-chief, the spiritual outlook of Morning Post Supplement was different, until the three editors-in-chief left one after another. Why did the intellectuals gather around the Morning Post, and what led them to part ways? This paper is divided into four chapters, in order to carry on the related discussion in these aspects. The first chapter is the foundation and preparation of the article. After abolishing the imperial examination system in 1905, the traditional intellectuals have a narrow living space and realistic situation. Explain why intellectuals regrouped, their social background when they gathered to run newspapers. It will also explain how intellectuals construct the space for running newspapers. In the second chapter, we will focus on how the three chief editors-in-chief of Li Dazhao, Sun Fuyuan and Xu Zhimo, as well as the intellectuals gathered around them, "speak" and "speak" on the platform of the Morning Post Supplement. Through the quantitative analysis of the dissemination contents of the Morning Post Supplement and the interpretation of the communication circle of the editors-in-chief, the reasons for the aggregation of the Morning Post Supplement and the intellectuals are explained. The third chapter reveals Li Dazhao and Sun Fuyuan through the analysis of the thoughts of the three major editors-in-chief of the Morning Post, the editorial characteristics and the presentation of the "background landscape" of the intellectuals surrounding the Morning Post Supplement. Xu Zhimo successively left the Morning Post supplement of the deep-seated reasons. The fourth chapter is the summary and sublimation of the article. It is demonstrated that the modern political intellectuals revolved around the Morning Post Supplement because of the original intention of setting up a newspaper, and once the "making a speech" conflicts with the thought of the editor-in-chief of the Morning Post, due to the awakening of the self-consciousness of the modern intellectuals, They will look for the next stage of public opinion that can "speak" and never let it go. Through the analysis of the "Morning Post Supplement" and the thought of the three major editors-in-chief newspapers and periodicals, it can be concluded that under the specific social and historical conditions and political environment, the media, including the supplement, propagate through their own consciousness and tendency. It can play its own unique role of public opinion mobilization to promote social progress, and the social environment in turn has promoted the reform of the media.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G213
本文编号：2452640
[Abstract]:After the abolishment of the imperial examination system, the life path of Chinese traditional scholar-bureaucrats to participate in politics was blocked. In the new historical context, intellectuals must replan their life paths. Instead of pinning their life ideals in temples and halls, they have moved towards the people. Some have set up schools, some have engaged in publishing, and some have begun to run newspapers. These activities made intellectuals begin to have their own independent character and value judgment. The Morning Post Supplement was born in this context. From February 1919 to 1926, Xu Zhimo left the Morning Post Supplement. In these seven years, the Morning Post Supplement has experienced three major editors-in-chief. During the period of different editors-in-chief, the spiritual outlook of Morning Post Supplement was different, until the three editors-in-chief left one after another. Why did the intellectuals gather around the Morning Post, and what led them to part ways? This paper is divided into four chapters, in order to carry on the related discussion in these aspects. The first chapter is the foundation and preparation of the article. After abolishing the imperial examination system in 1905, the traditional intellectuals have a narrow living space and realistic situation. Explain why intellectuals regrouped, their social background when they gathered to run newspapers. It will also explain how intellectuals construct the space for running newspapers. In the second chapter, we will focus on how the three chief editors-in-chief of Li Dazhao, Sun Fuyuan and Xu Zhimo, as well as the intellectuals gathered around them, "speak" and "speak" on the platform of the Morning Post Supplement. Through the quantitative analysis of the dissemination contents of the Morning Post Supplement and the interpretation of the communication circle of the editors-in-chief, the reasons for the aggregation of the Morning Post Supplement and the intellectuals are explained. The third chapter reveals Li Dazhao and Sun Fuyuan through the analysis of the thoughts of the three major editors-in-chief of the Morning Post, the editorial characteristics and the presentation of the "background landscape" of the intellectuals surrounding the Morning Post Supplement. Xu Zhimo successively left the Morning Post supplement of the deep-seated reasons. The fourth chapter is the summary and sublimation of the article. It is demonstrated that the modern political intellectuals revolved around the Morning Post Supplement because of the original intention of setting up a newspaper, and once the "making a speech" conflicts with the thought of the editor-in-chief of the Morning Post, due to the awakening of the self-consciousness of the modern intellectuals, They will look for the next stage of public opinion that can "speak" and never let it go. Through the analysis of the "Morning Post Supplement" and the thought of the three major editors-in-chief newspapers and periodicals, it can be concluded that under the specific social and historical conditions and political environment, the media, including the supplement, propagate through their own consciousness and tendency. It can play its own unique role of public opinion mobilization to promote social progress, and the social environment in turn has promoted the reform of the media.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G213
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董锦瑞;五四运动与革命报刊的发展[J];编辑学刊;1999年04期
2 何海巍;;五四时期报纸副刊的两种流变及其原因[J];浙江传媒学院学报;2008年02期
3 樊亚平,吴小美;“‘晨副’,我的喇叭”——论徐志摩主编的《晨报》副刊[J];甘肃社会科学;2000年01期
4 张李慧;;《晨报副刊》的发展概况[J];安徽文学(下半月);2010年01期
5 胡博;;《晨报副刊》与早期新月派[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
6 马诚;;浅谈孙伏园时期《晨报副刊》的编辑特色[J];今日湖北(理论版);2007年02期
7 王湘军,朱志敏;五十年来五四运动史研究概述[J];历史教学;1999年05期
8 崔银河;;《晨报》副刊与中国现代文学[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
9 张芹;;《晨报》附刊与五四时期科学启蒙运动[J];新闻界;2006年05期
10 李晓兰;;《晨钟报》特色专栏之“警语”[J];南通大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张芹;《晨报》附刊与“五四”新文化运动[D];华中师范大学;2001年
2 高艳红;孙伏园的副刊编辑思想研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
，本文编号：2452640
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2452640.html
