当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 出版论文 >

论网络服务提供商侵犯著作权犯罪的刑法适用

发布时间:2019-04-23 23:39
【摘要】:网络服务提供商是网络虚拟社会的重要群体之一,对网络的运营和发展起着举足轻重的作用,是促进当今网络技术的蓬勃发展和日益成熟的重要因素。从著作权的保护角度来讲,网络服务提供商对商业利润的追逐,一方面使得作品的传播途径多元化,传播速度日趋提升,文化产业市场得以快速拓展;但另一方面也使得著作权人对作品的控制能力减弱,成为其侵犯著作权甚至构成侵犯著作权罪的主要诱因。在著作权侵权甚至严重构成犯罪的情况在网络环境中越演越烈的今天,网络服务提供商在主观上对侵权事实的发生存在严重瑕疵,具有不可推卸的责任,因此,对严重侵权行为可能构成刑事犯罪并可通过刑事手段予以打击并不存在争议。而本文试图解决的问题便是网络服务提供商作为特殊的犯罪主体,面对网络空间中侵犯著作权犯罪的异化和扩张,传统刑法应该如何正确适用。 本文分为导言、正文和结论三部分,其中正文部分设有四章,总体结构上可分为三部分。 第一部分:第一章,主要阐述了网络服务提供商的概念、范围及分类,概括了网络服务提供商侵犯著作权犯罪的发展现状、造成的社会危害性及深层原因,并归纳了网络服务提供商有关侵犯著作权犯罪的刑事立法现状。 第二部分:包括第二章和第三章,分别针对网络内容服务提供商(ICP)和网络技术服务提供商(ISP)两类不同的主体,从侵权法视野分析两者的民事侵权责任的基础之上,运用传统的刑法理论,特别是重点运用了共同犯罪的理论,全面分析了网络服务提供商侵犯著作权罪的刑法适用问题。关于ICP的刑事责任,,主要阐述了ICP构成侵犯著作权罪时主观上认定“以营利为目的”,客观方面确定在网络环境下的定罪数额,以及不构成共同犯罪等问题。关于ISP的刑事责任,主要阐述了ISP构成帮助犯的认定,重点分析了ISP与直接侵权著作权犯罪的实行者之间意思联络的片面性以及ISP客观行为上的不作为。 第三部分:第四章,阐述了网络服务提供商侵犯著作权犯罪的追诉困境及对策,笔者主张的观点主要包括:一是建议将ISP的帮助犯性质通过立法进行正犯化,二是建议将侵犯著作权罪的“以营利为目的”的主观条件取消,三是建议将侵犯著作权罪的定罪情节在网络环境中的扩张化。
[Abstract]:Network service provider is one of the most important groups in the network virtual society. It plays an important role in the operation and development of the network and is an important factor to promote the vigorous development and maturity of the network technology. From the point of view of copyright protection, the pursuit of commercial profits by network service providers, on the one hand, makes the spread of works diversified, the speed of dissemination is increasing day by day, and the market of cultural industry can be expanded rapidly; But on the other hand, the copyright owner's ability to control the works is weakened, which becomes the main inducement of the infringement of copyright and even constitutes the crime of infringing copyright. Today, when copyright infringement or even serious crime is becoming more and more serious in the network environment, Internet service providers have serious defects in the subjective occurrence of infringement facts and have responsibilities that cannot be shirked. There is no dispute that serious infringement may constitute a criminal offence and can be dealt with by criminal means. The problem that this paper tries to solve is how to correctly apply the traditional criminal law to the alienation and expansion of the crime of infringing copyright in cyberspace, as a special subject of crime. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the main body consists of four chapters, the overall structure can be divided into three parts. The first part: the first chapter mainly expounds the concept, scope and classification of the network service provider, summarizes the current situation of the development of the crime of infringing copyright by the network service provider, and the social harmfulness and the deep cause of the crime. And summarized the network service provider related to copyright infringement crime of criminal legislation status. The second part includes chapter two and chapter three, aiming at the two different kinds of subjects, (ICP) and (ISP), respectively, on the basis of analyzing the tort liability of the two groups from the perspective of tort law. By using the traditional theory of criminal law, especially the theory of joint crime, this paper analyzes comprehensively the application of criminal law to the crime of infringing copyright by the network service provider. With regard to the criminal liability of ICP, this paper mainly expounds the subjective determination of "profit-making purpose" when ICP constitutes a crime of infringing copyright, the objective determination of the amount of conviction in the network environment, and the problem that ICP does not constitute a joint crime and so on. With regard to the criminal liability of ISP, this paper mainly expounds the cognizance of ISP as a crime of help, and emphatically analyzes the one-sidedness of the relationship between ISP and the implementers of direct infringement of copyright, as well as the omission in the objective act of ISP. The third part: the fourth chapter, elaborated the network service provider infringes the copyright crime the prosecution predicament and the countermeasure, the author advocates the viewpoint mainly includes: first, the suggestion carries on the legalization through the legislation to the help crime nature of the ISP, Secondly, it is suggested that the subjective condition of "profit-making" for copyright infringement should be abolished, and that the criminalization circumstances of copyright infringement should be expanded in the network environment.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 彭文华;网络服务商之刑事责任探讨[J];佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版);2004年03期

2 陈兴良;“应当知道”的刑法界说[J];法学;2005年07期

3 郭丹;高立忠;;网络知识产权的刑事法保护[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年03期

4 于志刚;;侵犯著作权罪中“以营利为目的”的网络异化——以珊瑚虫QQ案为视角[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年07期

5 李娜;;网络服务商(ISP)刑事责任的解构[J];理论月刊;2011年06期

6 郝方f ;;关于构成侵犯著作权罪应否需要“以营利为目的”的理性思考——兼评《关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》中的相关规定[J];西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年05期

7 张雨林;许红缨;;ICP上载作品的著作权思考[J];信息网络安全;2006年03期

8 黄斯蓓;张敏;;侵犯著作权犯罪中“以营利为目的”问题研究[J];南京医科大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期

9 赵秉志,张新平;试论网络共同犯罪[J];政法论坛;2002年05期

10 崔立红 ,秦野;网络时代知识产权犯罪问题研究及其对策[J];知识产权;2001年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 车岩;不作为帮助犯研究[D];吉林大学;2011年

2 楚武龙;在线影视盗版的刑法规制[D];中国政法大学;2011年

3 盛文超;毒品犯罪主观故意认定问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年

4 李彦宏;BT下载的刑法规制[D];中国政法大学;2010年

5 于耀辉;网络搜索服务提供商侵犯著作权的刑事责任[D];中国政法大学;2010年

6 李晨曦;犯罪故意明知问题研究[D];郑州大学;2010年



本文编号:2463909

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2463909.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户36ca0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com