网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任研究
发布时间：2019-06-17 11:12
【摘要】：伴随网络技术的持续发展和计算机的普及，互联网早已深入到社会发展的各个方面，对社会公众的生活产生了不容忽视的重大影响。人们在享受互联网海量信息资源给生活带来的高度便利的同时，也不得不面对频发的网络侵权问题。著作权侵权法律问题虽然早已产生，但计算机复制技术的发展让网络空间中的作品面临更高的侵权风险。著作权侵权问题在网络空间的大幅“放大”引发了社会各界的广泛关注，而此问题的焦点就在于网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任的认定。由于存在于网络空间中，网络服务提供者著作权侵权具有不同于传统著作权侵权的特征，侵权形式多样，更是给立法带来了新的考验。网络服务提供者、互联网用户、著作权人三方的利益有待立法予以平衡。我国网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任立法虽在不断的进步，但是仍有诸多未尽完善之处，如立法效力层级偏低、具体规则不甚明晰等。 为厘清这些问题，本文以“百度文库侵权门”中存在的法律问题分析为切入点，对网络服务提供者及其侵权责任的理论基础进行探讨，于国际立法中寻找可借鉴经验，并对我国相关法律制度进分析，总结不足之处，进而对法律制度的完善提出部分构想。 本文除引言和结语外，总共包括五个部分： 第一部分，详细介绍“百度文库侵权门”事件发展脉络以及作家联盟诉百度案件判决结果，，提出对网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任的几点法律思考。 第二部分，阐述了网络服务提供者的定义及其种类、网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任的概念及特点，并对其需要承担侵权责任的三点法理依据进行探讨。 第三部分，考察国外相关立法经验，比较美国、德国、欧盟、日本在此问题上的同异，从归责原则和免责条件两个方面总结可为我国借鉴的经验。 第四部分，结合我国相关立法对网络服务提供者著作权侵权的归责原则、责任认定、责任形态以及免责事由进行逐一分析，并在此基础上总结我国立法的缺失之处。 第五部分，提出对我国网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任基本制度的完善建议，包括归责原则、惩罚性损害赔偿的引入、著作权侵权比对制度的建立，并对网络著作权创新保护进行制度探索。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of network technology and the popularization of computer, the Internet has already penetrated into all aspects of social development, which has had a great impact on the life of the public. People not only enjoy the high convenience brought by the massive information resources of the Internet, but also have to face the frequent network infringement problem. Although the legal problems of copyright infringement have long arisen, the development of computer replication technology makes the works in cyberspace face higher infringement risk. The large "magnification" of copyright infringement in cyberspace has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life, and the focus of this problem lies in the identification of copyright infringement liability of network service providers. Because it exists in cyberspace, the copyright infringement of network service providers is different from the traditional copyright infringement, and the forms of infringement are various, which brings a new test to the legislation. The interests of network service providers, Internet users and copyright owners need to be balanced by legislation. Although the legislation of copyright infringement liability of network service providers in China is making continuous progress, there are still many imperfections, such as the low level of legislative effectiveness, the lack of clarity of specific rules and so on. In order to clarify these problems, this paper takes the analysis of the legal problems existing in Baidu Library Tort door as the starting point, probes into the theoretical basis of network service providers and their tort liability, finds out the experience that can be used for reference in international legislation, analyzes the relevant legal systems in our country, sums up the shortcomings, and then puts forward some ideas for the perfection of the legal system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of five parts: the first part introduces in detail the development of "Baidu Library infringement door" and the judgment results of the Writers Alliance v. Baidu case, and puts forward some legal thoughts on the copyright infringement liability of network service providers. The second part expounds the definition and types of the network service provider, the concept and characteristics of the copyright infringement liability of the network service provider, and probes into the three legal basis of the infringement liability of the network service provider. The third part examines the relevant legislative experience of foreign countries, compares the similarities and differences of the United States, Germany, the European Union and Japan on this issue, and summarizes the experiences that can be used for reference by our country from two aspects: the principle of imputation and the condition of exemption. The fourth part, combined with the relevant legislation of our country to the network service provider copyright infringement imputation principle, liability cognizance, the liability form and the exemption matter carries on the analysis one by one, and on this basis summarizes the lack of our country legislation. The fifth part puts forward some suggestions on the basic system of copyright infringement liability of network service providers in our country, including the principle of imputation, the introduction of punitive damages, the establishment of copyright infringement comparison system, and the exploration of the system of network copyright innovation protection.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41;D923
本文编号：2500943
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of network technology and the popularization of computer, the Internet has already penetrated into all aspects of social development, which has had a great impact on the life of the public. People not only enjoy the high convenience brought by the massive information resources of the Internet, but also have to face the frequent network infringement problem. Although the legal problems of copyright infringement have long arisen, the development of computer replication technology makes the works in cyberspace face higher infringement risk. The large "magnification" of copyright infringement in cyberspace has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life, and the focus of this problem lies in the identification of copyright infringement liability of network service providers. Because it exists in cyberspace, the copyright infringement of network service providers is different from the traditional copyright infringement, and the forms of infringement are various, which brings a new test to the legislation. The interests of network service providers, Internet users and copyright owners need to be balanced by legislation. Although the legislation of copyright infringement liability of network service providers in China is making continuous progress, there are still many imperfections, such as the low level of legislative effectiveness, the lack of clarity of specific rules and so on. In order to clarify these problems, this paper takes the analysis of the legal problems existing in Baidu Library Tort door as the starting point, probes into the theoretical basis of network service providers and their tort liability, finds out the experience that can be used for reference in international legislation, analyzes the relevant legal systems in our country, sums up the shortcomings, and then puts forward some ideas for the perfection of the legal system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of five parts: the first part introduces in detail the development of "Baidu Library infringement door" and the judgment results of the Writers Alliance v. Baidu case, and puts forward some legal thoughts on the copyright infringement liability of network service providers. The second part expounds the definition and types of the network service provider, the concept and characteristics of the copyright infringement liability of the network service provider, and probes into the three legal basis of the infringement liability of the network service provider. The third part examines the relevant legislative experience of foreign countries, compares the similarities and differences of the United States, Germany, the European Union and Japan on this issue, and summarizes the experiences that can be used for reference by our country from two aspects: the principle of imputation and the condition of exemption. The fourth part, combined with the relevant legislation of our country to the network service provider copyright infringement imputation principle, liability cognizance, the liability form and the exemption matter carries on the analysis one by one, and on this basis summarizes the lack of our country legislation. The fifth part puts forward some suggestions on the basic system of copyright infringement liability of network service providers in our country, including the principle of imputation, the introduction of punitive damages, the establishment of copyright infringement comparison system, and the exploration of the system of network copyright innovation protection.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 屈茂辉;;论民法上的注意义务[J];北方法学;2007年01期
2 吴汉东;;侵权责任法视野下的网络侵权责任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期
3 汪波;试论网络著作权的法律保护[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2001年02期
4 张丽波;马海群;周丽霞;;避风港原则适用性研究及立法建议——由百度文库侵权案件说起[J];图书情报知识;2013年01期
5 吴汉东;;论网络服务提供者的著作权侵权责任[J];中国法学;2011年02期
6 杨立新;;《侵权责任法》规定的网络侵权责任的理解与解释[J];国家检察官学院学报;2010年02期
本文编号：2500943
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2500943.html
