侦查程序地位研究

发布时间：2018-07-09 21:12

本文选题：侦查 + 程序　；参考：《中国政法大学》2001年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文分引言、正文和结论三部分。引言部分简要描述了我国传统刑事诉讼观念中对国家权力和公民权利的认识。在此基础上，认为我国刑事诉讼中侦查权过分膨胀的观念原因在于侦查权在实践中获得了一种“司法”的地位，并指出我国刑事诉讼程序中实际上存在着以侦查为中心的弊端。正文分为三部分。第一部分对侦查权的性质展开了集中讨论。这一部分从两个典型案例出发，介绍了我国实践中对侦查权控制的新动向，以及由此引发的研究侦查权性质的必要性。论文从一般意义上概括了司法与行政的不同特征，在此基础上，通过对侦查权特征的分析，，认为侦查权在本质上是一种行政权，侦查权和审判权是国家行政权和司法权在刑事诉讼领域的具体表现形式。第二部分探讨了侦查程序在刑事诉讼中的地位问题。这一部分首先对刑事诉讼程序的划分方式作了研究，认为刑事诉讼程序总体上可划分为侦查和审判两大部分。在现代刑事诉讼中，侦查程序是一个兼具行政特性和司法特性的复合程序。针对侦查程序的地位问题，论文分析了侦查与审判、起诉的关系，主张侦查独立说。最后，论文考察了侦查职能与治安管理职能之间的紧密联系，从另一个方面印证了侦查的独立地位。第三部分是对侦查的司法控制。其中首先论述了控制侦查的必要性，然后分析了侦查的各种控制方式，指出司法控制方式是其中的重要方面。论文最后分析了司法审查和人身保护令制度，主张从保护公民权利的角度，建立独立于刑事诉讼领域之外的人身保护令制度。结论则简要归纳了全文主要内容，重申了作者的基本观点。
[Abstract]:This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction briefly describes the understanding of state power and civil rights in the traditional concept of criminal procedure in China. On this basis, the author thinks that the concept of excessive expansion of investigation power in criminal proceedings in our country has gained a kind of "judicial" status in practice. It also points out that the criminal procedure in our country actually has the malpractice of focusing on investigation. The text is divided into three parts. The first part focuses on the nature of the power of investigation. Starting from two typical cases, this part introduces the new trends in the control of investigation power in China's practice. And the necessity of researching the nature of investigation power. The paper generalizes the different characteristics of judicature and administration in general sense, and on this basis, through the analysis of the characteristics of investigation power, It is believed that the power of investigation is essentially an administrative power, and the power of investigation and jurisdiction is the concrete form of the state administrative power and judicial power in the field of criminal procedure. The second part discusses the status of investigation procedure in criminal proceedings. First of all, this part makes a study on the division of criminal procedure. The author thinks that the criminal procedure can be divided into two parts: investigation and trial. In modern criminal procedure, investigation procedure is a compound procedure with both administrative and judicial characteristics. Aiming at the status of investigation procedure, this paper analyzes the relationship between investigation, trial and prosecution, and advocates the theory of independence of investigation. Finally, the paper examines the close relationship between the investigation function and the public security management ability, and confirms the independent position of the investigation from another aspect. The third part is the judicial control of investigation. Firstly, it discusses the necessity of controlling investigation, then analyzes the various control ways of investigation, and points out that judicial control is an important aspect. Finally, the paper analyzes the system of judicial review and habeas corpus, and advocates to establish a system of habeas corpus independent of criminal procedure from the angle of protecting civil rights. The conclusion briefly summarizes the main contents of the paper and restates the author's basic point of view.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2001
【分类号】：D918

【参考文献】