从劳动教养的历史和现状浅析劳教制度的走向与立法选择

发布时间：2018-07-18 17:17

【摘要】： 制度是一种历史性的产物。中国的劳动教养制度产生、存在和发展于中国特定的社会历史条件，因此，人们研究劳动教养制度大多循着这样的思维规律，从了解背景入手，梳理其形成和演变，从而自觉或不自觉地走向历史清算，废除劳教的结论也由此得到了学界的普遍支持。然而，制度又是社会性的产物，透过众多的有关劳教争议，笔者越来越明确地感到，仅有清算性结论还不够，这不是说它不负责任地解构了劳教制度，相反学者们针对现有劳教制度提出的种种质疑，，能够帮助我们澄清原本混沌的观念性因素，深刻反思我国社会治安和犯罪预防决策思维中的诸多缺陷，并提示人们重新整理和认真对待社会治安与公民人权、司法权与警察权、社会发展长远需要与现实需要之间的辩证关系。
[Abstract]:Institution is a historical product. China's reeducation through labor system emerged, existed and developed in China's specific social and historical conditions. Therefore, people study the system of re-education through labor mostly follow the law of thinking, start with understanding the background, sort out its formation and evolution. Thus consciously or unconsciously to the historical liquidation, the conclusion of abolishing reeducation through labor has been generally supported by the academic circles. However, the system is the product of sociality. Through the numerous disputes about reeducation through labor, the author feels more and more clearly that the conclusion of liquidation is not enough. This is not to say that it has irresponsibly deconstructed the system of re-education through labour. On the contrary, the doubts raised by scholars on the existing system of re-education through labour can help us to clarify the original chaotic idealistic factors, and to reflect deeply on the many defects in the decision-making thinking of public security and crime prevention in our country. It also suggests that people should rearrange and seriously treat the dialectical relationship between social security and civil human rights, judicial power and police power, and the long-term needs of social development and the practical needs.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：D926.8

【相似文献】