建立以迁徙自由为目标的中国户口管理制度研究
[Abstract]:4 years ago, the Sun Zhigang case, which shocked the whole country, made an important step in the reform of the household management system in the whole country. Most of the city's temporary residence permit system was cancelled. But the urban and rural two yuan residence system that hindered the free migration of the population still took the important role of controlling urban population mechanical growth in all large and medium-sized cities and moved into the population of the city on the one hand The creation of huge social wealth, on the other hand, may cause a series of social problems, such as employment difficulties, traffic congestion, public security and so on, especially in developing countries. These possible risks lead to the delay of the reform of the two yuan account system in urban and rural areas in China. Outside the country, the population is allowed to move freely, and there is no residence barrier to restrict the migration of the population. The household registration system does not affect the process of population migration and urbanization, nor does it interfere with the normal operation of the social economy. With the development of China's market economy, the maladies of the two yuan household system in urban and rural areas are increasingly exposed. The voice of the reform of the management system of the mouth of the mouth is rising.
This article holds that China must speed up the reform of the household registration system and establish a one yuan household registration system aimed at the freedom of migration to truly restore the rights of citizens' freedom of migration, which is not only conducive to the overall improvement of the national quality and the exertion of the expertise, especially the optimization of the allocation of labor resources, and the promotion of the process of urbanization and the nationals of China. Economic development has an important role. Therefore, the study of this paper has important practical significance and long-term strategic significance. This paper tries to elaborate on the reform of China's household registration management system from five aspects.
The first part of the introduction describes the background of the article, the practical significance of the topic selection and the research status at home and abroad.
The second part expounds the three definitions of household registration management and the theoretical basis for the establishment of the residence management system. The Marx doctrine "two kinds of production" theory tells us that the household management system must conform to the principle that human production must adapt to the production of material information. The basic force is the rational economic consideration of the comparative benefit and the cost, which explains the reasons for the migration of the population from the four aspects of the factors affecting migration, the quantity of migration, the flow direction and the characteristics of the migrants. These theories use different methods to draw the same conclusion that the household management system should follow the population migration. The objective law of migration.
The third part expounds the formation process and cause of the current account management system in China. The article expounds the forming process and root of the Chinese household registration system from the theoretical, historical and economic aspects. In the years of the lack of planned economic materials, the system of household registration management has played an important historical role. With the economic reform as the center In all aspects of social life in China, the current household registration system restricts the freedom caused by the freedom of population migration. The fourth part introduces the methods of population management in the United States, Europe and Japan. Although the foreign countries are different from the methods of population management in our country, the management of "hukou" is still the world. The most fundamental social management system in the world is different. Many developed countries rely on the means of the market plus the legal system, which are more effective and reasonable than the single "administrative examination and approval" means in our country. It is worth our reference.
The fifth part expounds the necessity, feasibility, reform of the current household registration system and the realization of freedom of migration is the basic requirement for human survival. The current household registration system violates the basic requirements of the operation of the market economy, hinders the process of urbanization in China and hinders the surplus labor in the countryside. Space transfer has caused confusion in management, and the necessity of reform is self-evident. With the increasingly comprehensive and deep reform and opening up, the operation mechanism of the Chinese market economy is basically completed, the peak of the population growth has passed, the people's ability to bear the reform has been continuously strengthened, and the relevant policies of the state have been constantly adjusted and introduced to reform the current households in China. Population management system and the conditions for establishing a free-migration household registration system have basically matured.
The sixth part puts forward the goal and steps of establishing "the goal of the reform of the freedom of migration as the residence system, the implementation of the one dollar household registration management". The main content is to establish an identity system of household registration, the citizen has the freedom to choose to travel or settle from the place of residence independently, and the freedom of the citizen's migration is not subject to the account of the residence. The one yuan account system is a thorough reform goal, but it has a great risk. So how to control the social risk is the key to ensure the realization of the goal. It is necessary to control the risk of the reform process gradually from the two yuan system to the one yuan system. The article believes that in order to ensure the realization of the reform goal, it must follow four. The principle, in accordance with the method of progressive reform, carries out the overall decoupling of the household registration and interest, the supporting reform of the social related departments and the sound legislation of the legislation in order to ensure the smooth implementation of the reform. It is divided into three implementation stages for the control of risk: one is the implementation stage of the two yuan residence registration system between provinces and regions; and two is the condition. The implementation stage of the one yuan household registration system in the province is implemented. Three is the implementation stage of the one dollar household registration system between provinces and provinces. At the same time, we can consider different regions and have different choices at different stages.
The new meaning of this article is: first, in the relevant documents related to household registration reform in China, the general existence is the discussion of the phenomenon of the reform of the household registration system, and less on the general rule of population migration in theory. The theory of the migration law of the main population in this paper is the theory of "two kinds of production" of Marx doctrine, the theory of the model of the population flow model of the darling. The thrust tension theory has been systematically studied, which provides an important theoretical basis for the reform of the household registration system in China. Second, the reform of the Chinese household registration system is a high risk and difficult reform. The four principles of controlling risk including the decoupling of the account and the benefit as a whole, and the three gradual reform steps of controlling the risk, that is, adopt the form of residence permit, step by step from the two yuan account system to the one yuan household registration system gradually, and finally complete the reform of the national household registration system. Therefore, this paper provides the reform of China's household registration. Operable ideas and methods have certain innovation and application value.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:D631.42
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨平;迁徙自由立法的趋势和构想[J];甘肃政法成人教育学院学报;2001年03期
2 刘建军;重申公民迁徙自由权利——纪念现行宪法实施20周年[J];政法论丛;2003年01期
3 薛江武;对公民迁徙自由的立法思考[J];法商研究-中南政法学院学报;1994年01期
4 薛江武;对公民迁徙自由的立法思考[J];法律适用;1994年01期
5 殷啸虎,林彦;我国法律关于迁徙自由规定的变化及其思考[J];法学;2001年06期
6 黄燕;迁徙自由入宪与户籍制度问题探讨[J];四川警官高等专科学校学报;2004年04期
7 阿元;迁徙自由,不再是遥远的梦[J];21世纪;1999年05期
8 岳智明;我国宪法应恢复迁徙自由[J];河南社会科学;1999年04期
9 莫纪宏,张树义,杜纲建;迁徙自由:户籍制度改革的终极目标[J];领导决策信息;2001年15期
10 李保成;改革户籍制度实现迁徙自由[J];郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版);2004年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 苗连营;杨会永;;权利空间的拓展——农民迁徙自由的宪法学分析[A];新农村建设的制度保障[C];2005年
2 姜金良;郑晓剑;;民法视域内的国际迁徙问题[A];21世纪出入境(移民)管理研讨会论文集[C];2008年
3 翁里;江美艳;;论华侨入出境管理与中国新出入境法[A];21世纪出入境(移民)管理研讨会论文集[C];2008年
4 潘国平;;人员的自由往来与亚洲联盟的成立[A];21世纪出入境(移民)管理研讨会论文集[C];2008年
5 周治滨;张星炜;付建明;;以促进社会公平正义为目标 构建维护社会稳定工作新机制[A];科学发展观与中国特色社会主义——全国社会科学院系统邓小平理论研究中心第十一届年会暨学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
6 罗细敏;;贯彻落实科学发展观,切实保障农民权利——农民权利缺失的现状与思考[A];“深入学习十七大精神,,贯彻落实科学发展观”理论研讨会论文集[C];2008年
7 陈勇;;现实必要性的合法管制抑或习惯性的僭越设限——对内地居民进入香港、澳门地区制度安排的检视[A];21世纪出入境(移民)管理研讨会论文集[C];2008年
8 杨晓玲;;弱势群体的平等权保护[A];中国法学会行政法学研究会2010年会论文集[C];2010年
9 朱应平;;变通或放弃执行现行法律规范是保护弱势群体不得已的一种方法[A];中国法学会行政法学研究会2010年会论文集[C];2010年
10 管华;;新中国宪法学研究的十大关键词——以宪法学年会综述和年度综述为基础的分析[A];陕西社会科学界第3届学术年会辉煌60年中国特色社会主义理论与道路专题论坛文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 刘立纲;沈阳取消“农业”“非农”户口之分[N];辽宁日报;2010年
2 傅达林;迁徙自由的权利与可能[N];中华工商时报;2005年
3 李晓莉;保障迁徙自由:为构建和谐社会叩门[N];西安日报;2005年
4 本报记者 潘晓凌;自下而上改是高成本的改革[N];南方周末;2009年
5 中经;现阶段不能对迁徙自由改革寄予太高希望[N];发展导报;2002年
6 记者 于力;沈阳市户籍管理取消农与非农划分[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
7 本报记者 张帆;迁徙自由:在法律认可与保障间徘徊[N];中国经济时报;2005年
8 闻 名;破解现行户籍制度的“大坝僵局”[N];中国商报;2005年
9 记者 丁锡国;为进城团圆,济南一家人等了34年[N];新华每日电讯;2003年
10 本报记者 张瑜;经济区升位惠及人口2359万[N];辽宁日报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 高建军;城乡社会同构的宪法学研究[D];郑州大学;2011年
2 余亚梅;政府偏好与制度变迁[D];复旦大学;2011年
3 李晓新;中国经济制度变迁的宪法基础[D];复旦大学;2009年
4 宋嘉革;中国户籍制度改革与农村人口城市化转移[D];东北财经大学;2006年
5 郑书前;企业基本经济权利论纲[D];西南政法大学;2008年
6 吴勇辉;城市少数民族流动人口权益保障研究[D];中央民族大学;2011年
7 季安照;阻力与对策[D];浙江大学;2010年
8 王文录;人口城镇化背景下的户籍制度变迁研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
9 桂家友;中国城乡公民权利平等化问题研究(1949-2010)[D];华东师范大学;2011年
10 廖丹;作为基本权利的居住权研究[D];武汉大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 阙江燕;建立以迁徙自由为目标的中国户口管理制度研究[D];上海交通大学;2008年
2 张雅清;现行宪法迁徙自由条款的恢复研究[D];湖南大学;2011年
3 湛念;论迁徙自由[D];湖南师范大学;2002年
4 奚坚平;论迁徙自由[D];安徽大学;2004年
5 陆静;论迁徙自由[D];中共中央党校;2002年
6 李铮;论迁徙自由与我国户籍制度改革[D];河南大学;2010年
7 罗庆菊;迁徙自由在新中国的变迁[D];湘潭大学;2006年
8 王凌云;我国户口管理制度研究[D];大连海事大学;2007年
9 李光霞;论迁徙自由及其宪法保障[D];武汉大学;2005年
10 陈晓东;迁徙自由视野下的政府移民[D];苏州大学;2009年
本文编号:2140332
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2140332.html