论我国司法鉴定启动程序的适用与完善
发布时间:2018-10-26 11:16
【摘要】:司法鉴定启动程序是鉴定制度上的一个基本问题,它是司法鉴定的起始一环,也是关键一环,对此进行深入细致地研究,有助于消除概念上的分歧,把握司法鉴定权的真实内容,统一司法鉴定实践,同时对于司法鉴定的立法以及诉讼当事人的权利保护均大有裨益。从我国目前情况来看,我国有关司法鉴定启动程序方面的立法较为简单,立法层次较低,立法中仍旧存在着不少空白。立法的不完善必然导致司法实践中出现诸多矛盾与问题:司法鉴定程序缺少透明度,鉴定当事人的权利得不到保障,多头鉴定、重复鉴定频繁发生。可以说目前我国司法鉴定领域出现的诸多问题及其争议,与司法鉴定程序尤其是启动程序的不完备有着非常密切的联系。因此,规范司法鉴定启动程序规则对于确保我国司法鉴定活动的健康发展有着举足轻重的意义。
[Abstract]:The initiation procedure of judicial identification is a basic problem in the appraisal system. It is the beginning and the key link of the judicial identification. To study it in depth and meticulous will help to eliminate the conceptual differences. Grasping the true content of the right of judicial expertise and unifying the practice of judicial expertise are of great benefit to the legislation of judicial expertise and the protection of the rights of litigants. From the current situation of our country, the legislation on the initiation procedure of judicial identification in our country is relatively simple, the legislative level is relatively low, and there are still many gaps in the legislation. The imperfect legislation will inevitably lead to many contradictions and problems in judicial practice: the lack of transparency in the judicial identification procedure, the lack of protection of the rights of the parties involved in the appraisal, the frequent occurrence of multiple identification and repeated identification. It can be said that there are many problems and disputes in the field of forensic expertise in our country at present, which are closely related to the incompleteness of judicial identification procedure, especially the initiation procedure. Therefore, it is of great significance to standardize the procedural rules for the initiation of forensic expertise in order to ensure the healthy development of judicial expertise activities in China.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D918.9
本文编号:2295541
[Abstract]:The initiation procedure of judicial identification is a basic problem in the appraisal system. It is the beginning and the key link of the judicial identification. To study it in depth and meticulous will help to eliminate the conceptual differences. Grasping the true content of the right of judicial expertise and unifying the practice of judicial expertise are of great benefit to the legislation of judicial expertise and the protection of the rights of litigants. From the current situation of our country, the legislation on the initiation procedure of judicial identification in our country is relatively simple, the legislative level is relatively low, and there are still many gaps in the legislation. The imperfect legislation will inevitably lead to many contradictions and problems in judicial practice: the lack of transparency in the judicial identification procedure, the lack of protection of the rights of the parties involved in the appraisal, the frequent occurrence of multiple identification and repeated identification. It can be said that there are many problems and disputes in the field of forensic expertise in our country at present, which are closely related to the incompleteness of judicial identification procedure, especially the initiation procedure. Therefore, it is of great significance to standardize the procedural rules for the initiation of forensic expertise in order to ensure the healthy development of judicial expertise activities in China.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D918.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 王世凡;;鉴定与司法鉴定概念的引入及其演进研究[J];法律与医学杂志;2007年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 王屏;论我国司法鉴定程序的现状及重构[D];华东政法大学;2007年
2 赵泓;我国刑事司法鉴定制度的研究[D];四川大学;2006年
3 鲍克锋;关于司法鉴定问题的若干思考[D];吉林大学;2007年
4 张春笋;试论我国司法鉴定制度的完善[D];山东大学;2008年
5 任阳;司法鉴定程序研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年
6 冯玉厅;刑事司法鉴定程序研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
7 徐菁;司法鉴定启动权的归属和行使[D];上海交通大学;2008年
8 陈茜;刑事司法鉴定制度研究[D];内蒙古大学;2009年
,本文编号:2295541
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2295541.html