论诱惑侦查基本问题的研究

发布时间：2018-11-12 18:05

【摘要】：诱惑侦查是世界各国司法实践中普遍认可的一种特殊侦查手段，虽然我国并未真正建立有关诱惑侦查的法律制度，但诱惑侦查在侦查实践中却被广泛运用于侦破传统侦查手段难以侦破的案件，如走私、贩毒、贩卖假币等。立法的缺失必然导致实践的问题，因此，我国亟需建立对诱惑侦查进行规制的法律制度，充分将诱惑侦查这种危险性较大的特殊侦查行为纳入法治化轨道。本文从对诱惑侦查的基本理论研究出发，并介绍总结了各国的立法经验，对诱惑侦查进行理性分析，最后提出了具体构建我国诱惑侦查的法律制度的设想。全文共分四个部分，约33000字。第一章为诱惑侦查的基本理论。在这一部分中，首先介绍了诱惑侦查的含义及特征。其次，将诱惑侦查与相关侦查手段进行比较。着重将诱惑侦查与侦查陷阱、卧底侦查、特情侦查、控制下交付进行比较分析。最后，，根据不同的标准对诱惑侦查进行分类。第二章主要是各国诱惑侦查理论与实践介绍。本章主要从英美法系和大陆法系对诱惑侦查不同的立法出发，介绍了各国侦查实践中的不同做法。重点介绍了美国五个经典的判例和美国限制诱惑侦查的手段“陷阱之抗辩”、“正当程序之抗辩”。第三章从法理角度出发对诱惑侦查进行理性分析。首先，提出诱惑侦查容易引发的问题。其次，提出理论上有关诱惑侦查的争议，肯定说、否定说、折衷说以及我国法学界对诱惑侦查的三种观点。再次，通过对诱惑侦查进行经济分析，指出其在实践中存在的意义。最后，分析了诱惑侦查的合理界线，提出了正当程序原则、不干涉意思自由原则、最为必要原则。第四章主要讨论如何建构我国诱惑侦查制度。首先，指出了我国诱惑侦查实践中所存在的问题。其次，从对诱惑侦查事前的司法控制角度出发，提出要严格限制诱惑侦查实施的主体、适用的范围、适用的对象和行为方式。再次，从对诱惑侦查事后的限制，提出判断诱惑侦查是否合法的标准，违法诱惑侦查的法律后果，最后，提出建立完善的证据规则将诱惑侦查纳入法治化的轨道。
[Abstract]:Enticement investigation is a special investigative technique that is generally accepted in the judicial practice of various countries in the world, although our country has not really established the legal system of temptation investigation. But the temptation investigation is widely used in the investigation practice, such as smuggling, drug trafficking, selling counterfeit money and so on. The lack of legislation will inevitably lead to practical problems. Therefore, it is urgent for our country to establish a legal system to regulate enticement investigation, and fully bring this dangerous special investigation behavior into the legal orbit. This article starts from the basic theory research of the temptation investigation, and introduces and summarizes the legislative experience of various countries, carries on the rational analysis to the temptation investigation, finally puts forward the concrete construction our country enticement investigation legal system tentative plan. The full text is divided into four parts, about 33000 words. The first chapter is the basic theory of enticement investigation. In this part, the first part introduces the meaning and characteristics of temptation detection. Secondly, the temptation investigation and related investigative techniques are compared. This paper focuses on the comparative analysis between seductive investigation and detection trap, undercover investigation, special investigation and controlled delivery. Finally, according to the different criteria for the classification of temptation detection. The second chapter mainly introduces the theory and practice of enticement investigation in various countries. This chapter mainly introduces the different practices in the investigation practice from the different legislation of the Anglo-American law system and the continental law system. This paper mainly introduces the five classic American cases and the American means of restricting the investigation of temptation, such as "the defense of trap" and "the defense of due process". The third chapter makes a rational analysis of the temptation investigation from the angle of legal theory. First of all, put forward the temptation investigation easy to cause the problem. Secondly, it puts forward the controversy about the temptation investigation in theory, affirmative theory, negation theory, compromise theory and three viewpoints of our country's legal circles on the temptation investigation. Thirdly, through the economic analysis of the temptation investigation, it points out its significance in practice. Finally, the reasonable boundary of temptation investigation is analyzed, and the principle of due process, the principle of freedom of free will and the most necessary principle are put forward. The fourth chapter mainly discusses how to construct the system of enticement investigation in our country. First of all, it points out the existing problems in the practice of temptation investigation in our country. Secondly, from the point of view of judicial control before seduction investigation, the author puts forward that the subject, the scope of application, the applicable object and the behavior mode of the seduction investigation should be strictly restricted. Thirdly, from the limitation of the seduction investigation afterwards, the paper puts forward the standard of judging whether the temptation investigation is legal or not, the legal consequence of illegal temptation investigation, and finally, it puts forward the establishment of perfect evidence rules to bring the temptation investigation into the track of rule by law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：D918;D915.3

【相似文献】