谈医疗事故鉴定中的法律规范与学术评判

发布时间：2018-11-13 19:34

【摘要】：目的综述近年来在医疗事故鉴定法律规范与学术评判方面所取得的研究进展以及研究成果。方法查询与分析近年来有关医疗事故鉴定法律规范与学术评判方面对应的学术研究成果以及期刊文献资料。对有关问题进行全面归纳与总结。结果在处理医疗事故鉴定法律规范与学术评判关系的过程当中,必须遵循三项基本原则,分别为责任法定原则、因果联系原则、以及责任对称原则。结论为了正确把握在医疗事故鉴定过程当中法律规范与学术评判的对应概念,对两者之间的关系与分分界有科学的认识,要求从事医疗事故鉴定工作恶化的人员能够全面认识现行与医疗行为相关的法规条款,在对法律法规的应用中融入科学原理以及医学专业知识,准确鉴别医疗事故的类型,特别是准确判断医疗事故中争议事件的责任归属问题,从而将医疗事故鉴定中的学术批判溶于法律规范当中。
[Abstract]:Objective to summarize the research progress and achievements in the legal norms and academic evaluation of medical malpractice identification in recent years. Methods to inquire into and analyze the corresponding academic research results and periodical documents on the legal norms and academic evaluation of medical malpractice identification in recent years. To carry on the comprehensive induction and the summary to the related question. Results in the process of dealing with the relationship between the legal norms of medical malpractice identification and academic evaluation, three basic principles must be followed, namely, the principle of legal liability, the principle of causality, and the principle of liability symmetry. Conclusion in order to correctly grasp the corresponding concepts of legal norms and academic judgment in the process of medical malpractice identification, there is a scientific understanding of the relationship and demarcation between the two. Personnel engaged in medical malpractice identification are required to have a comprehensive understanding of the existing provisions of laws and regulations related to medical behavior, to incorporate scientific principles and medical expertise into the application of laws and regulations, and to accurately identify the types of medical accidents, In particular, it is necessary to accurately judge the attribution of responsibility for the disputed events in medical malpractice, thus dissolving the academic criticism in the identification of medical malpractice in the legal norms.
【作者单位】：北京法源司法科学证据鉴定中心;
【分类号】：D919.4

【相似文献】