论犯罪学的当代学术前沿

发布时间：2018-11-24 20:17

【摘要】：在犯罪学的“学术前沿”前冠以“当代”两字 ,则意味着它指的是犯罪学研究在当前某个特定时期所处的制高点 ,并且反映着犯罪学最新研究阶段总的学科理论发展趋势。“三跨多维”这一立体式概括性命题是中国犯罪学乃至整个世界犯罪学学术前沿所面对的反映该学科前进方向的“世纪性论题” ,或者称之为“新世纪犯罪学学术前沿总命题”。形形色色的社会犯罪现象与扑朔迷离的个体犯罪行为 ,对西方、东欧传统犯罪学理论与我国犯罪学诸家学说所提出的挑战是相当严峻的 ,尽管全球犯罪学学术理论界显示出前所未有的活跃程度 ,然而 ,根基扎实、学养丰厚的创新理论却反而日益鲜见。出现这一“跨世纪犯罪学活跃程度与研究水平层反差景观”的症结点的原因 :1 犯罪学理论的吸纳面过狭 ;2 犯罪学伪说的批判意识过淡 ;3 犯罪学对策研究理论力度过弱。
[Abstract]:To put the word "contemporary" before "academic frontier" in criminology means that it refers to the commanding height of criminology research in a certain period at present, and reflects the general development trend of discipline theory in the latest stage of criminology research. The three-dimensional general proposition of "three transverses and multidimensional" is a "century topic" which reflects the direction of the subject in Chinese criminology and the whole world criminology academic frontier. Or called "the new century criminology academic frontier general proposition." The various social crime phenomena and the complicated individual criminal behavior are quite serious challenges to the western, Eastern European traditional criminological theory and the theory of Chinese criminology. Although the global criminology academic field has shown unprecedented activity, solid foundation, well-educated innovation theory is increasingly rare. The causes of the crux of the cross-century criminology active degree and research level contrast landscape are as follows: (1) the absorption of criminology theory is too narrow, (2) the critical consciousness of criminology false theory is too weak; The theory of criminology countermeasure research is too weak.
【作者单位】：福建现代犯罪学研究所!研究员福州大学教授
【分类号】：D917

【相似文献】