当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 公安论文 >

犯罪功能分析评述

发布时间:2019-02-25 11:31
【摘要】:犯罪有“促进社会”功能的观点,误导了学术研究,使犯罪有益论悄然兴起,将研究 引入了歧途。犯罪功能分析引出有“促进社会”功能的结论是荒谬的,荒谬的原因是单纯地把犯罪功能 看作是客观反应的现象,是事物的刺激因素,把受刺激事物的反应看作是其功能,导致了功能与其蕴涵的 事物分离的二元论,有违于功能的原意。功能属于总体活动中部分活动对总体活动所作的贡献。功能分析 通过考察社会要达到的目的或目标来解释社会活动,而不象犯罪功能分析者那样,脱离犯罪目的和目标, 通过犯罪者意料之外的结果考察犯罪,因而也导致了结论的荒谬。
[Abstract]:The view that crime has the function of "promoting society" misleads academic research, causes the crime beneficial theory to rise quietly, and leads the research astray. The analysis of criminal function leads to the conclusion that the function of "promoting society" is absurd. The absurd reason is that the criminal function is regarded as the phenomenon of objective reaction, is the stimulus factor of things, and the reaction of stimulated thing is regarded as its function. The dualism that leads to the separation of function from the things it contains is contrary to the original intention of function. The function belongs to the contribution of some activities to the overall activities. Functional analysis explains social activities by examining the goals or objectives to be achieved by society, unlike the criminal function analysts, who are divorced from the purposes and objectives of the crime, and examine the crime through the unexpected results of the offenders. This leads to the absurdity of the conclusion.
【作者单位】: 中国人民公安大学
【分类号】:D917

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 宋浩波;;犯罪功能分析评述[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2005年06期

2 于志刚;;对“犯罪有益论”中犯罪唤起审美感学说的批判——以现代电影中暴力美学为例的分析[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2008年01期

3 于志刚;;关于刑法学中“排气孔”和“安全阀”观点的反思——对“犯罪有益论”和“相对主义犯罪观”的批判[J];中国刑事法杂志;2007年06期



本文编号:2430115

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2430115.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4660f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com