当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 西方政治论文 >

中欧地缘战略关系中的美国因素分析

发布时间:2018-01-26 09:00

  本文关键词: 中欧 美国因素 地缘战略 地缘政治 地缘经济 地缘文化 出处:《华中师范大学》2006年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:2005年是中欧建交30周年,当前中欧关系处于历史上最活跃、最富有成果的时期,前景广阔。这两个处于欧亚大陆两端、崛起中的政治实体,正在构建一种稳定的、长期的战略合作。它将对重组中的世界秩序产生重要影响,有助于建构一个更为平衡、多元的国际新秩序。美国既是中欧战略接近的促进因素,又是制约因素,是影响中欧关系的主要外部力量。 论文从地缘战略角度来观察中美欧三角关系互动。以地缘战略相关概念的阐释为切入点,论述了地缘战略的研究内容和特点。地缘战略是由地缘政治发展而来的一种战略理论,但是随着世界地缘格局的变化,地缘战略理论研究的理论、方法和分析视角日趋多样与综合,在注重地缘政治分析的同时,开始关注地缘经济、地缘文化等分析。 中、欧是欧亚大陆权力结构的两根支柱,美国是远离欧亚大陆的海洋国家。欧亚大陆始终是美国地缘战略的重点。冷战时期,为了对付来自欧亚大陆腹地的威胁,美国严格控制了中欧地缘战略关系的发展,使之成为被动的“派生性关系”:而由于同样的原因,中欧均把发展对美地缘战略关系放在首位,中美关系、美欧关系均重于中欧关系。在全球地缘战略格局中,中美欧关系远不及中美苏、美欧苏三角关系成熟和重要,并没有形成典型的三角关系。冷战后特别是“9·11”事件、美伊战争后,美欧矛盾日益凸显,中欧互动令人瞩目。中欧同时面临来自美国地缘政治、经济和文化的压力,美国日益感受到来自中、欧的威胁。但美国无法控制的是,中欧关系已不再是“派生性”关系。中欧关系发展的独立性日益增强。中美欧三角关系已悄然形成。中美欧三角关系对抗性下降,竞争合作性加强,具有非对抗性和“非零和性”特点。三角利益交织在一起,互动频繁。 如何处理好中美、中欧以及中美欧三角关系是中国面临的一个现实问题。中美关系的主题正在从“中国问题”演变为“中国崛起问题”,内容更丰富,内涵更深刻。积极发展但同时要冷静对待中欧关系。立足周边,积极开展“大周边外交”战略,为中国的发展营造一个和平稳定的地缘环境。
[Abstract]:2005 marks the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the EU. At present, China-EU relations are in the most active and fruitful period in history, with broad prospects. These two political entities, both on the two ends of the Eurasian continent, are rising. A stable, long-term strategic partnership is being built that will have an important impact on the reorganized world order and help to build a more balanced one. The United States is not only a factor to promote and restrict the strategic approach of China and the EU, but also a major external force influencing China-EU relations. From the geo-strategic point of view, the paper observes the interaction between China, the United States and Europe, with the interpretation of geostrategic related concepts as the starting point. This paper discusses the research contents and characteristics of geo-strategy. Geo-strategy is a kind of strategic theory developed from geo-politics, but with the change of geo-structure in the world, the theory of geostrategic theory is studied. The methods and perspectives of analysis are becoming more and more diverse and comprehensive. At the same time, attention is paid to the analysis of geo-economy and geo-culture. China and Europe are the two pillars of the Eurasian power structure, and the United States is a maritime country far from Eurasia. Eurasia has always been the focus of America's geo-strategy. To counter the threat from the Eurasian hinterland, the United States strictly controlled the development of the geostrategic relationship between China and Europe, making it a passive "derivative relationship": for the same reason. Both China and Europe put the development of geostrategic relations with the United States in the first place. Sino-US relations and US-European relations are all more important than China-EU relations. In the global geo-strategic pattern, Sino-US and European relations are far less than those of China, the United States and the Soviet Union. The triangular relationship between the United States, Europe and the Soviet Union is mature and important, but it has not formed a typical triangular relationship. After the Cold War, especially the September 11 incident, the conflicts between the United States and Europe became increasingly prominent after the US-Iraq war. China-EU interaction is remarkable. China and Europe are also facing geopolitical, economic and cultural pressures from the United States, and the United States is increasingly feeling the threat from China and Europe. But what the United States cannot control is. China-EU relations are no longer "derivative" relations. The independence of the development of China-EU relations is increasing. The triangular relationship between China, the United States and Europe has quietly formed. The antagonism between China, the United States and Europe has declined, and competition and cooperation have been strengthened. It has the characteristics of non-adversarial and non-zero-sum. Triangular interests are intertwined and interact frequently. How to deal well with the triangular relations between China and the United States, China and the United States and Europe is a realistic problem facing China. The theme of Sino-US relations is changing from the "China issue" to "the issue of China's rise", with more contents. Positive development but at the same time should treat China-EU relations calmly. Based on the periphery, actively develop the strategy of "big peripheral diplomacy" to create a peaceful and stable geographical environment for China's development.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:D751;D871.2

【引证文献】

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 顾强;欧盟对华决策中的主体间认知差异评析[D];华东师范大学;2012年

2 张辛雨;中国与中亚能源开发合作研究[D];吉林大学;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 何火萍;冷战后中日两国东南亚地缘战略比较研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年

2 杨咏奕;论欧盟跨国公司对中欧关系的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2012年

3 蔡朝晖;国际非政府组织的消极作用及应对对策[D];中国地质大学(北京);2013年

4 徐思蓉;美国对缅甸价值观外交及其转变(1988-2013)[D];外交学院;2013年



本文编号:1465212

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/1465212.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户61b62***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com