欧盟非法移民治理研究
发布时间:2018-02-11 05:25
本文关键词: 欧盟 非法移民 治理 出处:《暨南大学》2010年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】: 全球化与人口迁移互为动力。全球化发展推动了人口的跨国流动,但与此同时,人类跨国迁移的自由却受到日益完善的政策法规制约,由此,也导致了非法移民问题的出现。 欧共体/欧盟作为当今世界区域一体化的典范,一方面要推动与区域外国家进行自由交往的外部全球化,另一方面又要在区域内部实现各要素自由流动的内部全球化。欧洲一体化进程推动了欧共体/欧盟社会的发展与进步,其中移民也起了重要的作用。但随着一体化进程的发展以及国内外各种因素的影响,欧洲主要国家逐步由自由放任的移民政策转向积极主动的限制性移民政策。合法的移民渠道被收紧,许多移民只能通过非正当途径进入或滞留。随着非法移民群体的积累壮大,他们给欧洲各国的政治、经济、文化、安全等方面带来了一系列问题,成为近年来欧盟社会上下关注的核心事务之一。 本文试从治理的视角出发,结合相关国际关系学、民族学、社会学、历史学等理论,通过治理的理论框架,分析了欧共体/欧盟各主体对非法移民的治理问题,以期归纳总结出一些治理的经验不足和发展规律。欧洲一体化的历史也被认为是欧共体/欧盟治理的历史。治理是各行为体对共同利益问题进行管理的过程。欧共体/欧盟在其一体化过程中逐步形成了自身的治理模式。在这一过程中,传统的国家治理主权不断地向上、下让渡,逐步形成了国家治理、超国家治理和次国家治理并存的欧盟多层治理模式。与此同时,治理的范围也不断拓展,由单一的经济治理扩大至当前的涵盖经济与政治、安全与外交、司法与内务等内容的三大支柱。非法移民问题一开始主要产生于各成员国层面,随着一体化进程的发展,90年代开始成为欧盟的共同关注的问题。欧盟的非法移民治理也同样在欧盟多层治理体系下于国家、超国家、次国家等层面分别展开。基于当前的国际社会现实,欧盟各成员国依然是最重要的治理主体,但已经难以单独完成非法移民治理,超国家治理的作用日益凸显,次国家治理则是有益的补充。欧盟非法移民治理面临着诸多挑战,其本身也是一个善治的发展过程,克服这些困难需要区域内各主体共同去协调努力。
[Abstract]:Globalization and population migration are mutual driving forces. Globalization promotes the transnational movement of population, but at the same time, the freedom of human transnational migration is restricted by the increasingly perfect policies and regulations, which also leads to the emergence of illegal immigration. As a model of regional integration in the world today, the EC / EU should, on the one hand, promote the external globalization of free communication with foreign countries in the region. On the other hand, it is necessary to realize the internal globalization of the free flow of elements within the region. The process of European integration has promoted the development and progress of the EC / EU society, Immigration also played an important role, but with the development of integration process and the influence of various factors at home and abroad, Major European countries have gradually shifted from laissez-faire immigration policies to proactive and restrictive immigration policies. Legal migration channels have been tightened, and many migrants can only enter or remain through irregular channels. They have brought a series of problems to the political, economic, cultural and security aspects of European countries, and have become one of the core concerns of the European Union in recent years. In this paper, from the perspective of governance, combined with the relevant theories of international relations, ethnology, sociology, history and so on, through the theoretical framework of governance, this paper analyzes the governance of various subjects of EC / EU to illegal immigration. The history of European integration is also considered to be the history of EC / EU governance. Governance is the process of various actors' management of common interests. In the process of integration, the Community / EU has gradually developed its own governance model. The traditional state governance sovereignty has been continuously transferred up and down, gradually forming a multi-layer European Union governance model in which state governance, supranational governance and sub-state governance coexist. At the same time, the scope of governance has been continuously expanded. From a single economic governance to the current three pillars covering economic and political, security and foreign affairs, justice and internal affairs. With the development of integration process, in the 1990s, it has become a common concern of the European Union. The European Union's illegal immigration governance is also under the multi-level governance system of the European Union in the national, supranational, Based on the current reality of the international community, EU member States are still the most important governing bodies, but it is already difficult to complete the governance of illegal immigrants alone. The role of supranational governance is becoming increasingly prominent. Sub-state governance is a useful supplement. The EU illegal immigration management faces many challenges, which is also a development process of good governance. To overcome these difficulties, all the main bodies in the region need to work together to coordinate their efforts.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D75
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 罗刚;;遏制非法出入境行为的对策建构——基于云南边境民族地区边防安全与民族习惯的现实考量[J];河北法学;2012年08期
2 罗刚;;论我国移民、非法移民概念的界定[J];政法论丛;2012年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 郭秋梅;全球治理视角下的国际迁移组织(IOM)研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘q,
本文编号:1502303
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/1502303.html