埃及社会转型期的政治合法性研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 11:23

本文选题：社会转型　切入点：政治合法性　出处：《上海外国语大学》2014年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“合法性”已经成为当代政治学和社会学的一个核心概念,它是决定政治权力体系存在、持续、稳定与发展的基础和前提,是任何政治权力都必须面对,又必须认真解决的问题。2011年春天中东地区发生严重动荡,导致了几个政权垮台,埃及等共和制阿拉伯国家在这次革命浪潮中之所以群体性陷入动乱,根本原因是这些国家政权丧失了政治合法性。对埃及巨变的解释,不可局限于三年多来发生的政治动荡。置于更长的历史中考察,才能够梳理出埃及二百多年来社会转型过程中,政治合法性自身运行、变化的规律以及对不同政体下政治权力运行的作用和影响。本文除导论和结论部分外,共分为五章,分析结构及其框架安排如下导论部分主要是对论文的研究背景、国内外相关研究概况、理论基础、研究方法、写作思路和创新点的介绍。第一章“社会转型与政治合法性问题”,在梳理社会转型、合法性概念的起源与演变的基础上,介绍和评析学界有关社会转型和政治合法性问题的不同观点,阐述本文对社会转型和政治合法性问题的基本认识,为以下几章的论述打下理论基础和分析框架。以下“王朝自强”、“自由宪政”、“共和新政”和“后穆巴拉克时代的埃及”等四章,分别具体探讨了埃及在探索社会转型的不同阶段和历史时期的所面临的政治合法性问题。以上四章作为论文主体部分,在章节安排上体现了内在的逻辑联系。四章分别从不同历史阶段和时期考察了埃及近代以来,在探索民族解放、民族复兴道路,即实现社会转型道路这一根本任务方面所作的努力。合法性说到底是一个认同进而服从的问题。本文的目的就是探讨近代以来埃及人民对埃及政府探索转型道路的认同问题。前一阶段在政治方面,特别是在争取民族独立和打破权力垄断方面的软弱和在推动经济社会进步方面的保守,导致这一时代末期的深刻危机,进而促使埃及选择崭新的发展道路。 “关于埃及社会转型期政治合法性问题的若干思考”,是论文结论部分。本章在总结、概括上述各章分析和论证的基础上,认为埃及从传统社会向现代社会转变的过渡过程,即社会现代化的过程,是一个涉及到诸多方而的系统工程,任务繁多,矛盾错综复杂,其间的挫折是不可避免的。本章分析了影响埃及国家政治民主化进程的因索,总结埃及了等中东伊斯兰国家政治民主化实践的特征和类型,论述在社会转型期如何处理发展、改革(主要指政治民主化)与稳定的关系,最后是对中东伊斯兰国家民主化前景的展望。
[Abstract]:"legitimacy" has become a core concept in contemporary politics and sociology. It is the basis and prerequisite for determining the existence, continuity, stability and development of the political power system. In the spring of 2011, serious unrest in the Middle East led to the collapse of several political regimes, and Egypt and other Republican Arab countries fell into turmoil in the midst of this revolutionary wave. The root cause is that these regimes have lost political legitimacy. The explanation of the great changes in Egypt cannot be limited to the political turmoil that has occurred in the past three years or so. It is only through a longer history that the political legitimacy itself can be sorted out in the course of Egypt's social transformation over the past 200 years. The law of change and its influence on the operation of political power under different polity. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into five chapters. The structure and framework of the analysis are as follows. The introduction part mainly introduces the research background, the domestic and foreign related research survey, the theory foundation, the research method, the writing thought and the innovation point. The first chapter "Social transformation and political legitimacy", on the basis of combing the origin and evolution of the concept of social transformation and legitimacy, introduces and comments on the different viewpoints of academic circles on social transformation and political legitimacy. This paper expounds the basic understanding of social transformation and political legitimacy, and lays a theoretical foundation and an analytical framework for the following chapters. The following four chapters, "Dynasty self-strengthening", "Free constitutionalism", "New Republican deal" and "Egypt in the post-Mubarak era", respectively discuss the political legitimacy of Egypt in exploring different stages and historical periods of social transformation. The above four chapters, as the main body of the thesis, reflect the internal logical connection in the chapter arrangement. The four chapters examine the modern Egyptian national liberation and national rejuvenation road from different historical stages and periods, respectively. In the end, legitimacy is an issue of identity and obedience. The purpose of this paper is to explore the transition path of the Egyptian people to the Egyptian government since modern times. The political aspect of the previous phase, Especially the weakness in fighting for national independence and breaking the monopoly of power and the conservatism in promoting economic and social progress led to a deep crisis in the end of this era and prompted Egypt to choose a new way of development. "some reflections on the political legitimacy in the transition period of Egyptian society" is the conclusion of the paper. This chapter, on the basis of summing up the analysis and argumentation of the above chapters, holds that the transition process of Egypt from the traditional society to the modern society, That is, the process of social modernization is a systematic project involving many parties, with numerous tasks, complicated contradictions and inevitable setbacks. Summarizing the characteristics and types of political democratization practices in the Islamic countries of the Middle East, such as Egypt, and discussing how to deal with the relationship between development, reform (mainly political democratization) and stability in the period of social transformation, Finally, the prospect of the democratization of the Islamic countries in the Middle East.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D741.1

【参考文献】