阿根廷危机的国际关系分析

发布时间：2018-04-16 22:07

本文选题：阿根廷危机 + 国际关系　；参考：《复旦大学》2004年博士论文

【摘要】：阿根廷在20世纪90年代取得了令大多数发展中国家羡慕的经济发展,同时也被西方发达国家视为实施新自由主义改革取得成功的“榜样”。但从2001年年末一直蔓延到2002年,阿根廷国内陷入了一场全面的经济、政治和社会危机。目前大多数对这次危机进行分析的已有成果基本上都是从经济的角度或是强调阿根廷国内政策失误,即使谈到外部因素,大多也是指责国际货币基金组织(IMF)在指导和援助方面犯了错误。本文认为:阿根廷危机是国内和国际两方面因素共同作用的结果,就阿根廷十年来所推行的新自由主义政策而言,国际因素的作用更为明显。第一章是说明本文进行分析的理论框架。包含两方面内容,一是通过介绍近半个世纪关于国际体系结构与发展中国家发展模式的理论发展,说明阿根廷这些年来在国家发展模式上的变化。二是通过介绍古勒维奇关于国际关系中“颠倒的第二种意象”的理论及其发展,说明阿根廷危机正是这种国际因素构成国内危机原因的例证。第二章是对阿根廷危机的回顾。在这一章中,首先对被很多人认为是这次危机“罪魁祸首”的货币局体制进行全面评价。本文认为,相比于其国内的其他政治、经济和社会政策,将危机归咎于货币局体制是不负责任的。导致阿根廷危机的国内因素包括:与货币局体制不相适应的大规模举债发展战略、不负责任的财政政策以及全盘接受新自由主义发展模式而没有注意这种模式与阿根廷国内社会状况不相适应所造成的严重后果等方面, 结果,阿根廷虽然在90年代取得了快速的经济增长,但同时也为危机的爆发埋下了伏笔。第三章是从国际经济的角度进行分析。首先是国际金融体系与金融全球化的影响,阿根廷的全面金融自由化使国家完全丧失了对其国内金融体系的控制。其次,阿根廷在利用外资的政策上也有失误,一方面,其外资的构成中直接投资比例过小,另一方面,在使用外债问题上犯了不少错误。再次,在贸易自由化的过程中,未能相应地解决好产业结构调整问题,而是在传统的比较优势理论指导下,走上了非工业化道路,加深了对发达国家的技术依附。最后一点是分析新自由主义在这次危机中扮演的角色。第四章是阐述国际政治的变化对阿根廷危机的作用。一方面强调了近20年来非国家行为体的兴起对传统国家主权职能的侵蚀作用,如IMF以及跨国公司这些非国家行为体在这次危机中扮演了非同寻常的作用。另一方面则主要是分析这十年中美国政策的变化对阿根廷危机的影响。最后一章是总结这次危机的经验教训。在经济全球化的背景下,发达国家 WP=5 向广大发展中国家大力输出新自由主义的发展模式是从其自身利益出发的。在各国相互依赖不断增强的同时,发展中国家应该认识到,这种相互依赖是不对称的,强大的国际性因素可能会对本国国内发展带来严重的消极影响。在面临国际性因素对国内发展的影响时,必须处理好国家(政府)与市场以及国际与国内两方面的关系。
[Abstract]:Argentina has kept enviable economic growth for many developing countries in 1990s, but also by the western developed countries as the implementation of the new liberalism reform successful model. But from the end of 2001 has been spread to Argentina in 2002, into a comprehensive economic, political and social crisis. Most of the existing crisis the analysis results are basically from the economic point of view is that Argentina or domestic policy mistakes, even on external factors, most criticized the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has made a mistake in the guidance and assistance. This paper argues that the crisis in Argentina is the interaction of the two factors of domestic and international results, the implementation of Argentina ten years of the new liberalism policy, international factors are more obvious.
The first chapter is the analysis of the theoretical framework includes two aspects, one is through the introduction of the theory about the development of the international system and development pattern of developing countries for nearly half a century, Argentina changes in the pattern of national development on these years. The two is through the introduction of Guler Vecchi's Theory of international relations "the second image reversed" and the development of Argentina crisis is the domestic crisis caused by international factors example.
The second chapter is a review of the Argentina crisis. In this chapter, firstly, is considered by many people to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the crisis "arch-criminal" of the currency board system. This paper argues that, compared with other domestic political, economic and social policies, blamed the crisis on the currency board system is irresponsible. Lead national factors including the crisis in Argentina: the strategy of development on large-scale debt does not adapt to the currency board system, irresponsible fiscal policy and accept the new liberalism development mode and did not pay attention to this pattern and Argentina domestic social situation does not adapt to the serious consequences, results, although Argentina achieved in 90s. Rapid economic growth, but also for the outbreak of the crisis foreshadowed.
The third chapter is the analysis from the perspective of international economy. The first is the impact of the international financial system and financial globalization, Argentina financial liberalization makes the country completely lost control of the domestic financial system. Secondly, Argentina has made mistakes, in the use of foreign capital policy on the one hand, the foreign direct investment in the form the proportion is too small, on the other hand, many mistakes in the use of foreign debt problems. Thirdly, in the process of trade liberalization, fail to solve the problem of industrial structural adjustment, but in the traditional theory of comparative advantage under the guidance, the way of deindustrialization and deepen technical dependence on developed countries the last point is the analysis of the new liberalism played in this crisis.
The fourth chapter is the role change described international political crisis in Argentina. It is emphasized that in recent 20 years, the rise of non-state actors in undermined traditional sovereignty on the one hand, these multinational companies such as IMF and unstate played an extraordinary role in the crisis. On the other hand is mainly analysis the influence of American policy in the ten years of the crisis in Argentina.
The last chapter is a summary of the experience and lessons of the crisis. In the context of economic globalization, developed countries
WP=5
The development mode of developing countries to the output of the new liberalism is from its own interests. Strengthening interdependence in various countries at the same time, developing countries should be aware of this interdependence is asymmetric and powerful international factors will bring serious negative impact on domestic development. Facing the impact of international factors on the domestic development, must deal with the state (government) and the relationship between the market and the international and domestic two aspects.

【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：D778.3

【引证文献】