东亚地区合作进程中的民族主义因素研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 19:30

本文选题：民族主义 + 东亚地区合作　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：冷战结束后,在地区合作快速发展的同时,各国的民族主义也日益彰显,两股潮流错节纠葛,交互影响,成为影响地区结构体系变化的两个关键变量。民族主义与地区合作究竟存在何种关联和互动关系,不同的学者有着不同的看法。有学者认为地区合作是民族主义的扩大,强调二者之间的相容性；而更多学者则将民族主义看作是阻碍地区合作深入发展的因素,突出二者之间的矛盾性。本文试图构建一种民族主义与地区合作的互动框架来研究东亚地区合作。本文首先探讨了民族主义对地区合作的影响路径,通过分析从民族认同到地区认同的两种路径和四种影响因素——物质因素的影响路径包括环境因素、民族文化与经历、国家利益三个变量,规范因素的影响路径则主要是指地区合作的理念和制度——认为民族主义与地区合作之间存在着两种互动关系：积极互动和消极互动。然后通过分析东亚民族主义与地区合作的关系发现,东南亚和东北亚次区域意识及其内部民族主义之间关系的差异,使得民族主义与地区合作在东亚的两个次区域形成了两种不同的关系类型和互动路径——东南亚的积极互动关系和东北亚的消极互动关系。从规范的角度出发促进整个东亚地区合作的发展是我们探寻建立东亚地区合作的重要途径,而从本质上来说,建立东亚的地区规范就是要建立起整个东亚地区民族文化的认同。具体说来,全文分为六个部分进行阐述：第一部分为导论,这部分主要是提出本文的研究主题——东亚民族主义与地区合作的互动关系,并对该选题的理论意义和现实意义、选题研究的现状、选题研究的思路与框架以及所采用的研究方法等进行阐述。第二部分是民族主义与地区合作在全球化语境下的发展。本部分主要是分析民族主义和地区合作的概念和性质,并且对在全球化背景下两者的内涵的新发展进行分析和界定。第三部分是民族主义与地区合作的互动关系与影响因素。本部分主要是分析民族主义是通过何种方式和路径影响地区合作并与之产生何种互动关系。首先确定了民族主义与地区合作存在关系的关键是从民族认同上升为地区认同。接着本部分分析了从民族认同到地区认同的两种路径和四种影响因素,即物质因素的影响路径包括环境因素、民族文化与经历因素、国家利益因素三个变量,而规范因素的影响路径则主要是指地区合作的理念和制度因素。最后通过对这两种路径和四种影响因素的分析得出民族主义与地区合作的互动有两种结果即积极的互动和消极的互动。第四部分是东亚民族主义与地区合作互动关系的案例分析。在这一部分中,将以东南亚和东北亚为案例,对民族主义与地区合作互动关系的分析框架,即二者形成积极互动或消极互动的条件和路径进行检验。第五部分是东亚地区合作的途径和可行性分析。这一部分主要是在前面两部分的分析基础上从影响因素和影响路径出发来探讨东亚地区合作的途径和可行性。第六部分是结语。在前文论述的基础上对东亚民族主义与地区合作的互动关系作进一步的深化和总结。
[Abstract]:After the end of the cold war, while regional cooperation has developed rapidly, nationalism of all countries is also becoming more and more obvious. Two strands of tidal current entanglement and interaction have become the two key variables that affect the change of regional structural system. What kind of relevance and interrelationship exist between nationalism and regional cooperation, different scholars have different opinions. It is considered that regional cooperation is the expansion of nationalism, emphasizing the compatibility between the two, while more scholars regard nationalism as a factor hindering the development of regional cooperation and highlight the contradiction between the two. This paper tries to construct an interactive framework of nationalism and regional cooperation to study regional cooperation in East Asia. The influence path of nationalism on regional cooperation is discussed. Through the analysis of the two paths and four influencing factors from national identity to regional identity, the path of influence of material factors includes environmental factors, national culture and experience, three variables of national interests, and the path of the influence of normative factors mainly refers to the concept and system of regional cooperation. There are two kinds of interaction relations between nationalism and regional cooperation: positive interaction and negative interaction. Then through the analysis of the relationship between East Asian nationalism and regional cooperation, it is found that the subregional consciousness of Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia and its internal relations between nationalism make the nationalism and regional cooperation in East Asia. The two subregions have formed two different types of relations and interaction paths - the positive interaction relationship between Southeast Asia and the negative interaction relationship of Northeast Asia. From a normative perspective, promoting the development of the whole East Asian cooperation is an important way for us to explore the establishment of East Asian cooperation. In essence, the establishment of East Asia region. The norm is to establish the identity of the whole ethnic culture in East Asia.
Specifically, the full text is divided into six parts:
The first part is the introduction, this part is mainly to put forward the research theme of this article - the interactive relationship between East Asian nationalism and regional cooperation, the theoretical and practical significance of the topic, the present situation of the topic, the idea and framework of the research and the method of research.
The second part is the development of nationalism and regional cooperation in the context of globalization. The main part of this part is to analyze the concept and nature of nationalism and regional cooperation, and to analyze and define the new development of the two in the context of globalization.
The third part is the interaction and influencing factors of nationalism and regional cooperation. This part is mainly to analyze the way and path of nationalism to influence regional cooperation and to produce what kind of interaction. The key to the relationship between nationalism and regional cooperation is to increase the national identity to regional identity. This part analyzes two kinds of paths and four influencing factors from national identity to regional identity, that is, the path of the influence of material factors includes environmental factors, national culture and experience factors, and three variables of national interest factors, while the influence path of normative factors mainly refers to the concept and institutional factors of regional cooperation. Finally, through this two. The analysis of the path and the four factors shows that there are two results in the interaction between nationalism and regional cooperation, that is, positive interaction and negative interaction.
The fourth part is a case study of the interaction relationship between East Asian nationalism and regional cooperation. In this part, the analysis framework of the interaction relationship between nationalism and regional cooperation will be taken as the case of Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia, that is, to test the conditions and paths of the positive interaction or negative interaction between the two parties.
The fifth part is the way and feasibility analysis of regional cooperation in East Asia. This part is mainly based on the analysis of the two parts of the preceding part to explore the ways and feasibility of the cooperation in East Asia from the influence factors and the impact path.
The sixth part is the conclusion. Based on the foregoing discussion, we further deepen and summarize the interactive relationship between East Asian nationalism and regional cooperation.

【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D562

【参考文献】