中美英行政管理型知识产权网络信息服务对比研究

发布时间：2018-05-17 03:36

本文选题：中美英三国 + 行政管理型知识产权网络　；参考：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年01期

【摘要】：就传统知识产权专业领域(专利、商标、版权)而言,当今世界各国行政管理型知识产权网络信息服务呈现出以中国为代表的专利、版权和商标信息服务分离型、以美国为代表的专利商标和版权信息服务并立型和以英国为代表的专利、版权和商标信息服务综合型三种模式。中国模式具有分散性特点,在专利信息资源的整合服务方面有一定的优势;美国模式具有专利、商标和版权信息服务同步发展、专业资源整合服务强的明显优势,尤其在版权信息资源整合方面积累了丰富的经验;英国模式则对知识产权信息进行综合服务,因而具有资源全面整合优势,同时体现了以人为本的特色。我们应该吸取经验、系统推进,尽快构建我国综合性知识产权公共信息服务平台,为实施知识产权战略、建设创新型国家服务。
[Abstract]:As far as the traditional intellectual property field (patent, trademark, copyright) is concerned, the administrative intellectual property network information service in various countries in the world is characterized by patent, copyright and trademark information service, which is represented by China. The patent trademark and copyright information service, represented by the United States, and the patent, copyright and trademark information service, represented by the United Kingdom, are integrated. The Chinese model has the characteristics of decentralization and has certain advantages in the integration of patent information resources. The American model has the obvious advantages of the simultaneous development of patent, trademark and copyright information services, and the strong integration of professional resources. Especially the integration of copyright information resources has accumulated rich experience; the British model provides comprehensive services to intellectual property information, so it has the advantage of comprehensive integration of resources and embodies the characteristics of people-oriented. We should learn the experience, advance systematically, construct the comprehensive intellectual property public information service platform of our country as soon as possible, and serve for the implementation of intellectual property strategy and the construction of innovative country.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“国家知识产权文献及信息资料库建设研究”(10&ZD133)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D523;F204

【参考文献】