威权类型与转型后民主:南美四国比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-24 05:11

本文选题：威权类型政治社会 + 民主巩固　；参考：《国外理论动态》2014年06期

【摘要】：本文立足于巴西、阿根廷、智利、乌拉圭的经验,试图证明威权政体的类型是决定民主巩固和民主质量方面差异的关键性因素。威权政体的类型可以从三个方面透视,即组织化程度、核心利益方团结的程度、对公民社会中的民主势力进行分化和压制的程度。威权政体的类型直接决定了新旧政治势力围绕民主体制的建立、运转进行博弈的状态,我们可以将新旧势力围绕民主体制进行的博弈状态称为政治社会,而民主的巩固和民主质量只不过是政治社会的反映。在实现了民主转型之后,不同的威权政体之所以在民主巩固和民主质量方面出现差异,关键在于这些新兴民主国家有着不同类型的初始威权政体,从而构造了不同类型的政治社会。
[Abstract]:Based on the experience of Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, this paper tries to prove that the type of authoritarian regime is the key factor in determining the differences in the consolidation and quality of democracy. The types of authoritarianism can be seen from three aspects, namely, the degree of organization, the degree of unity of core stakeholders, and the degree of division and suppression of democratic forces in civil society. The type of autocracy directly determines the state of the new and old political forces playing game around the establishment and operation of democratic system. We can call the game state of new and old forces around democratic system as political society. The consolidation and quality of democracy are merely a reflection of political society. After the transition to democracy, the key to the differences in the consolidation and quality of democracy among different authoritarian regimes lies in the fact that these emerging democracies have different types of initial authoritarianism. Thus constructed different types of political society.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学政治学研究所;
【分类号】：D777

【相似文献】