试论全球治理的国家自理机制

发布时间：2018-09-10 14:12

【摘要】：学术界经常讨论的全球治理机制主要集中在全球性机制、俱乐部机制和地区性机制等类型上,而这些国际导向的机制都在一定程度上忽视了民族国家在全球治理中的作用。在全球治理的背景下,民族国家更多地成为一种连接国内社会和国际社会以对公共资源进行传输和再分配的制度通道。从这一意义上讲,国家自理也是全球治理的一种重要机制。与之前的"国际谈判—国际监督"模式不同,国家自理强调民族国家在一种非强制和非绑定的状态下对全球规范的主动学习和积极内化。在中文的意义中,治理的内涵有着丰富的国家自理特征。具体而言,国家自理机制包括自我学习机制、自我转化机制、自我实施机制、自我监督机制和自我总结机制等。总体来看,国家自理机制只是全球治理机制中的一种,这表明其无法取代其他机制的作用。通过国家自理机制,全球治理的观念可以更多地变成实际行动,并且在这一过程中民族国家的自主性得以重建。
[Abstract]:The mechanism of global governance, which is often discussed in academic circles, is mainly focused on the types of global mechanism, club mechanism and regional mechanism. To some extent, these international oriented mechanisms neglect the role of nation-state in global governance. Under the background of global governance, nation-state has become a kind of institutional channel which connects the domestic society with the international community to transmit and redistribute the public resources. In this sense, national self-care is also an important mechanism of global governance. Different from the previous model of "international negotiation-international supervision", national self-care emphasizes the active learning and positive internalization of global norms by nation-state in a non-compulsory and unbound state. In the Chinese sense, the connotation of governance has rich characteristics of national self-care. Specifically, the national self-care mechanism includes self-learning mechanism, self-transformation mechanism, self-implementation mechanism, self-supervision mechanism and self-summing mechanism. Overall, the national self-care mechanism is only one of the mechanisms of global governance, indicating that it cannot replace the role of other mechanisms. Through the national self-care mechanism, the concept of global governance can be more translated into practical action, and in this process, the autonomy of nation-state can be rebuilt.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学政治学研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“全球治理与主权国家之间的协调关系研究”(13CGJ021) 中国博士后基金一等资助项目“中国参与全球治理:一种政治哲学的分析”(2013M530056);中国博士后基金特别资助项目“全球治理的哲学基础:中西方的比较”(2014T70098)
【分类号】：D523

【参考文献】