冷战后澳大利亚对东帝汶政策的转变：原因及其影响
发布时间：2018-11-09 16:59
【摘要】： 在东南亚地区,随着柬埔寨问题的解决,东帝汶问题就成为该地区最主要的安全问题之一。东帝汶问题自1974年印尼入侵东帝汶产生以来一直是地区热点之一。东帝汶独立过程的特殊性还在于:其一,独立过程异常漫长从1974年算起一直到2002年才最终实现独立;其二,独立的代价非常大,从争取独立的1974年开始,大量的东帝汶人非正常死亡,甚至高达总人口的1/4;其三,东帝汶独立过程是在冷战结束之后才开始启动的,这是冷战后为数很少的新独立国家,在其独立过程中外部大国特别是澳大利亚发挥了特殊的作用。本文就试图对这个小国独立的过程进行分析,对外部大国澳大利亚所发挥的作用进行探析。 本文的目的是对东帝汶独立的过程进行梳理,探讨东帝汶独立过程中澳大利亚和印尼的关系,找出澳大利亚在东帝汶独立过程中所发挥的作用。所以本文分以下几部分来组织论文:导论部分对国内外研究现状作了回顾,并提出了本文的变量和假设,介绍了本文所采用的分析方法;第一章对东帝汶问题的由来做了分析;第二章对冷战后澳大利亚对东帝汶政策的演变做了分析,重点分析了工党政府和霍华德联合政府对东帝汶政策的变化;第三章是本文的重点,分析澳大利亚对东帝汶政策形成和转变的原因,运用层次分析法对各种原因条分缕析;第四章根据上文的分析概括出澳大利亚对东帝汶独立的影响;最后在结论部分,笔者力图通过上文个案的分析来揭示出两个问题:中等强国的外交逻辑和冷战后小国的独立之路。 本文的重点在于第三章和第四章的分析,通过分析本文认为,澳大利亚在东帝汶独立过程中发挥了:东帝汶问题的“透视镜”、东帝汶独立进程的“启动者”、联合国驻东帝汶机构的关键支持者和东帝汶重建的“帮助者”四种角色的作用。
[Abstract]:In Southeast Asia, with the settlement of Cambodia, East Timor has become one of the most important security problems in the region. The question of East Timor has been one of the regional hotspots since the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in 1974. The particularity of the independence process of East Timor lies in the following aspects: first, the independence process was unusually long from 1974 to 2002; Second, the cost of independence is very high. Since 1974, when independence was won, a large number of East Timorese have died unnaturally, even as high as a quarter of the total population. Thirdly, the process of independence of East Timor began only after the end of the cold war, a small number of newly independent States after the cold war, in which the outside Powers, particularly Australia, played a special role. This paper attempts to analyze the process of independence of this small country and the role played by Australia. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the process of East Timor's independence, to explore the relationship between Australia and Indonesia in the process of East Timor's independence, and to find out the role played by Australia in the process of East Timor's independence. So this paper is divided into the following parts to organize the paper: the introduction part reviews the domestic and foreign research status, and puts forward the variables and hypotheses of this paper, introduces the analytical methods adopted in this paper, the first chapter makes an analysis of the origin of the East Timor problem; The second chapter analyzes the evolution of Australia's policy towards East Timor after the Cold War, focusing on the changes in the policy of the Labor Government and Howard's coalition government on East Timor. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, analyzes the reasons for the formation and transformation of Australia's policy towards East Timor, analyzes the causes by AHP, and summarizes Australia's influence on the independence of East Timor according to the above analysis. Finally, in the conclusion part, the author tries to reveal two problems through the analysis of the above cases: the diplomatic logic of the middle power and the road of independence of the small country after the cold war. This paper focuses on the analysis of chapters 3 and 4. It is concluded that Australia has played a role in the process of East Timor independence: the "mirror" of East Timor, the "initiator" of East Timor's independence process. The role of key supporters of the United Nations presence in East Timor and the role of the "helper" of East Timor's reconstruction.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D734.6
本文编号：2321027
[Abstract]:In Southeast Asia, with the settlement of Cambodia, East Timor has become one of the most important security problems in the region. The question of East Timor has been one of the regional hotspots since the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in 1974. The particularity of the independence process of East Timor lies in the following aspects: first, the independence process was unusually long from 1974 to 2002; Second, the cost of independence is very high. Since 1974, when independence was won, a large number of East Timorese have died unnaturally, even as high as a quarter of the total population. Thirdly, the process of independence of East Timor began only after the end of the cold war, a small number of newly independent States after the cold war, in which the outside Powers, particularly Australia, played a special role. This paper attempts to analyze the process of independence of this small country and the role played by Australia. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the process of East Timor's independence, to explore the relationship between Australia and Indonesia in the process of East Timor's independence, and to find out the role played by Australia in the process of East Timor's independence. So this paper is divided into the following parts to organize the paper: the introduction part reviews the domestic and foreign research status, and puts forward the variables and hypotheses of this paper, introduces the analytical methods adopted in this paper, the first chapter makes an analysis of the origin of the East Timor problem; The second chapter analyzes the evolution of Australia's policy towards East Timor after the Cold War, focusing on the changes in the policy of the Labor Government and Howard's coalition government on East Timor. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, analyzes the reasons for the formation and transformation of Australia's policy towards East Timor, analyzes the causes by AHP, and summarizes Australia's influence on the independence of East Timor according to the above analysis. Finally, in the conclusion part, the author tries to reveal two problems through the analysis of the above cases: the diplomatic logic of the middle power and the road of independence of the small country after the cold war. This paper focuses on the analysis of chapters 3 and 4. It is concluded that Australia has played a role in the process of East Timor independence: the "mirror" of East Timor, the "initiator" of East Timor's independence process. The role of key supporters of the United Nations presence in East Timor and the role of the "helper" of East Timor's reconstruction.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D734.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;吴邦国委员长访问新加坡、澳大利亚、新西兰和马来西亚情况的书面报告[J];中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报;2005年05期
2 张秋生;二战以来澳大利亚对亚洲政策的演变[J];当代亚太;1996年03期
3 刘樊德;澳大利亚为何得以领军多国部队进驻东帝汶?[J];当代亚太;1999年11期
4 刘新生;走向独立的东帝汶[J];当代亚太;2000年04期
5 晓雅;东帝汶主要政治人物[J];当代亚太;2000年04期
6 张位均;东帝汶独立问题浮出水面[J];当代亚太;1999年04期
7 钟合;穿上新衣的东帝汶[J];东南亚纵横;2001年04期
8 石谋旺;新生的国家 发展的处女地——初进东帝汶[J];东南亚纵横;2002年05期
9 李开盛,周琦;中国与东帝汶关系的历史、现状及前景[J];东南亚纵横;2004年02期
10 黄昆章;澳大利亚对东南亚的研究[J];东南亚研究资料;1983年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张鹏;从东帝汶问题的历史演变看澳大利亚的“南太平洋主义”[D];外交学院;2001年
，本文编号：2321027
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2321027.html
