俄罗斯民粹主义的历史比较
发布时间：2019-05-29 20:20
【摘要】：由于时间和空间的巨大跨度,"民粹主义"这一概念有着极其复杂的内涵。对历史上的民粹主义与当代的民粹主义现象进行比较研究,将有助于深入认识并解释这一政治现象。而历史与现实的比较,往往必须经历一条特殊—普遍—特殊的发展途径。以俄罗斯为例,其民粹主义研究的发展过程就依循了19世纪发生了俄国民粹派运动—俄国民粹派运动属于民粹主义现象的一支—当代俄罗斯存在民粹主义现象—对俄罗斯民粹主义现象进行历史比较这一逻辑。本文在分析俄罗斯的民粹主义现象时将依据上述逻辑,从民粹主义诉求公平的主体、公平的具体内涵以及达到公平的途径三要素入手,分别对19世纪俄国的民粹派思想家与当代俄罗斯政治领袖普京思想中的核心内容进行研究,并对二者之间的异同进行比较。本文发现,二者都面临俄罗斯悠久的专制主义传统和西方民主制度在社会政治改革领域失效的双重阻碍,但同时又在客观条件、主导者和影响三方面存在巨大差异。当代俄罗斯的政治领袖很有可能在部分继承了俄国的民粹派运动传统的基础上,在与之不同的层次和领域发展出新的形式。
[Abstract]:Because of the huge span of time and space, the concept of populism has an extremely complex connotation. A comparative study of the historical populism and the contemporary populism will help to deeply understand and explain this political phenomenon. The comparison between history and reality often has to go through a special, universal and special way of development. Take Russia as an example. The development process of his populism research follows the 19th century when the Russian populist movement, which belongs to the populist phenomenon, belongs to the populist phenomenon in contemporary Russia. The logic of historical comparison of semantic phenomena. In this paper, according to the above logic, this paper will start with the main body of populism's demand for fairness, the concrete connotation of fairness and the ways to achieve fairness, according to the above logic. This paper studies the core contents of the thoughts of Russian populist thinkers and contemporary Russian political leader Putin in the 19th century, and compares the similarities and differences between them. This paper finds that both of them face the dual obstacles of the long tradition of authoritarianism in Russia and the failure of western democratic system in the field of social and political reform, but at the same time, there are great differences in objective conditions, dominance and influence. The political leaders of contemporary Russia are likely to develop new forms at different levels and fields on the basis of partly inheriting the tradition of the populist movement in Russia.
【作者单位】： 北京大学政府管理学院;
【分类号】：D751.2
本文编号：2488201
[Abstract]:Because of the huge span of time and space, the concept of populism has an extremely complex connotation. A comparative study of the historical populism and the contemporary populism will help to deeply understand and explain this political phenomenon. The comparison between history and reality often has to go through a special, universal and special way of development. Take Russia as an example. The development process of his populism research follows the 19th century when the Russian populist movement, which belongs to the populist phenomenon, belongs to the populist phenomenon in contemporary Russia. The logic of historical comparison of semantic phenomena. In this paper, according to the above logic, this paper will start with the main body of populism's demand for fairness, the concrete connotation of fairness and the ways to achieve fairness, according to the above logic. This paper studies the core contents of the thoughts of Russian populist thinkers and contemporary Russian political leader Putin in the 19th century, and compares the similarities and differences between them. This paper finds that both of them face the dual obstacles of the long tradition of authoritarianism in Russia and the failure of western democratic system in the field of social and political reform, but at the same time, there are great differences in objective conditions, dominance and influence. The political leaders of contemporary Russia are likely to develop new forms at different levels and fields on the basis of partly inheriting the tradition of the populist movement in Russia.
【作者单位】： 北京大学政府管理学院;
【分类号】：D751.2
【相似文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 庞彬彬;特朗普2016总统竞选中的民粹主义表现[D];北京第二外国语学院;2017年
，本文编号：2488201
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2488201.html
