历史文化名城保护与旅游发展的优先:桂林案例

发布时间：2018-01-01 23:22

本文关键词：历史文化名城保护与旅游发展的优先:桂林案例　出处：《社会科学家》2015年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：政府主导是中国经济转型时期实现旅游业可持续发展的关键。文章运用新政治经济视角和方法,检阅政府在处理历史文化名城保护与旅游业优先发展中发挥的作用,以历史文化名城桂林为例进行实证研究,通过比较分析桂林两江四湖与鲁家村两大景区的治理模式,进一步探讨旅游开发与历史文化名城保护的政策过程。其中,鲁家村代表基于基层组织运作的政府主导、社区参与的城乡统筹的生态旅游示范基地;而两江四湖则是政府引导、市场运作下实现城市文化旅游产业转型升级的一个蓝本。文章指出,在历史文化名城保护和旅游开发实践中,必须坚持经济发展和旅游立法相协调,构建一个官、民、商等多元主体参与、多方利益共享的政策体系。
[Abstract]:Government leading is the key to realize the sustainable development of tourism in the period of Chinese economic transformation. This paper applies the new political and economic perspective and method. Review the role of the government in dealing with the protection of historical and cultural cities and the priority development of tourism, taking Guilin as an example to carry out empirical research. Through the comparative analysis of the two major scenic spots in Guilin, Guilin and Lujia Village, the policy process of tourism development and the protection of historical and cultural cities is discussed. Lujia Village represents the demonstration base of ecotourism based on the operation of grass-roots organizations led by the government and the participation of the community in urban and rural areas as a whole; The two rivers and four lakes are a blueprint for the transformation and upgrading of the urban cultural tourism industry under the guidance of the government and market operation. The article points out that in the protection and tourism development practice of historical and cultural cities. We must persist in the coordination of economic development and tourism legislation, and construct a policy system in which the officials, the people, the commercial and other pluralistic subjects participate in and share the interests of all parties.
【作者单位】：广西大学商学院;
【基金】：广西哲学社会科学规划项目(11BJY033) 广西大学人文社科基金项目(XBS100019) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(10JZD022)研究成果 “广西大学211工程四期重点学科群:中国-东盟经贸合作与发展研究项目”资助
【分类号】：K878;F592.7
【正文快照】： 文化遗产治理在历史文化名城保护与旅游开发之间中是一对矛盾共同体。一方面,文化遗产通过旅游开发成为促进地方经济发展的有价资源,成为地方营销的卖点和营销工具。另一方面,历史文化名城也日益商业化,当今文化遗产遭到自然、人为破坏的现象比比皆是。因此有人主张文化遗产只

【参考文献】