定州汉简《儒家者言》研究

发布时间：2018-01-10 16:33

本文关键词：定州汉简《儒家者言》研究　出处：《河北师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：1973年，河北省定县40号汉墓出土了大批竹简，经整理有书约八种。其中一种，整理者定名为《儒家者言》。该书共整理出二十七章，内容多为孔子及其弟子的言行。此竹简自发表以来，引起不少学者的关注，产生了一批研究成果。但是此题目还留有再深入研究的余地。本文在前人研究的基础上，提出了自己的一些看法。本文共分五部分。第一部分为绪论，阐述选题意义和综述学术史。第二部分为简文校读，对《儒家者言释文》的瑕疵一一指出，对部分竹简进行补字、编联，并对某些字的释读和竹简的分章提出自己的看法。第三部分为文章的主体，在前人研究的基础上进一步探讨《儒家者言》的成书年代和性质。本文认为《儒家者言》成书在先秦，但部分章节（如：第三章、第八章）则作于汉初；《儒家者言》与阜阳双古堆一号木牍不仅性质相同，且皆为先秦文献《孔子家语》的不同节选本。虽然此出土简本《儒家者言》抄写年代相对较晚，但它乃是未经孔安国整理的《孔子家语》的节选本。刘向编《说苑》时亦采用了《儒家者言》，但所用本子与出土本不同，为孔安国整理后的本子。第四部分亦为文章的主体，，在前人研究的基础上进一步探讨今本《孔子家语》的成书及文献价值。本文认为《儒家者言》在与今本《孔子家语》相关的十章中，至少有七章（《儒家者言》第二、三、六、七、十一、十四、十五章）或本于《儒家者言》的不同传本，或另有渊源，总之较《说苑》等文献更为古朴，其文献价值应予肯定。第五部分为结语。
[Abstract]:In 1973, Hebei Province set a large number of bamboo slips unearthed County No. 40 tomb, after finishing books about eight. One of them, named "order. The book is Confucian statement to sort out the content for the twenty-seven chapter, Confucius and his disciples. The words and deeds of bamboo since its publication, many scholars paid attention to. A number of research results. But the topic also left room for further study. Based on the previous research, puts forward some views.
This article is divided into five parts.
The first part is the introduction, which describes the significance of the topic and the history of the academic review.
The second part is the school to read, "Confucian statement text > defects that fill the words on the part of bamboo author, and put forward their own views on some chapters of word interpretation and bamboo.
The third part is the main body of the article, on the basis of previous studies to further explore the "Confucian statement > in a book and nature. This paper argues that" Confucian statement > book in the pre Qin period, but some sections (such as the third chapter, the eighth chapter) is made in early Han Dynasty; Confucian statement > and < Fuyang gudui, wooden slips are not only similar in nature, and the pre Qin literature < Confucius Jiayu > different Festival anthology. Although the unearthed bamboo slips < Confucian statement > copy in relatively late, but it is not sorted by Kong Anguo < Confucius > Jiayu. This extract series < Shuoyuan > Liu when the "Confucian statement", but with the book and the unearthed, as konganguo after finishing the book.
The fourth part is the main body of the article, to further explore the books and literature value of the current "Confucius Jiayu" on the basis of previous research. This paper argues that "Confucian statement in the < > > Confucius Jiayu ten chapter related, at least seven chapters (" Confucian statement > second, third. Six, seven, eleven, fourteen, fifteen) or the transmission of this chapter is different from the "Confucian statement", or otherwise in origin, is "Shuoyuan > literature is more simple, its literature value should be affirmed.
The fifth part is the conclusion.

【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：K877.5;B222

【参考文献】