具茨山刻划符号形体初探

发布时间：2018-03-11 01:33

本文选题：具茨山刻划符号　切入点：形体　出处：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：具茨山地处中原腹地,积淀有深厚的历史文化因素,1988年在具茨山上发现了巨量岩画,它不仅填补了中原岩画空白的缺憾,也为中原文化、历史、和文字研究提供丰富的资料。2008~2009年考古工作者在对具茨山岩画进行的调查过程中发现,这批岩画中有126个刻划符号,其中有43个与现有甲骨文在形体上具有较高的契合度,占这批刻划符号的34.13%。目前,具茨山岩画的研究成果主要集中在岩画内涵的解读上,对具茨山刻划符号形体的研究还有待于进一步的深入。为考察具茨山刻划符号与现有甲骨文之间的关系,对具茨山刻划符号形体做初步探究,本文首先将具茨山刻划符号与甲骨文作形体上的对比,单纯的形体对比并不足以说明它们之间有什么必然联系,因为这之间缺少证据链条将二者连接起来,这是本文的重点,也是难点。之后便以时间为序,文章将河南省现有的早期的各个时期、各个遗址的刻划符号都整理出来,与具茨山刻划符号、甲骨文一一比对,探究具茨山刻划符号、河南早期刻划符号与甲骨文在形体上与甲骨文所拥有的共性,是否具备一脉相承的关系。无论是历史文献还是历史传说,总是将黄帝与具茨山与新郑联系起来,而黄帝时代又有仓颉造字的传说,文献记载的黄帝活动的历史时期与具茨山刻划符号现所考察的年代有一个阶段性重合,本文充分考虑具茨山独特的地理环境、历史文化背景和时代性,从历时和共时两个角度展开论证,并结合相关的文字学、考古学、历史传说、历史文献等各方面的研究成果,为具茨山刻划符号形体探究提供新的思路和方法。本文采取归纳和比较的方法展开对具茨山刻划符号形体的初步探究,为探寻河南早期刻划符号与文字之间的关系提供大致的脉络和新的依据,充分展示具茨山刻划符号所具备的文字学价值,呈现一个关于具茨山刻划符号形体研究的新认识。
[Abstract]:Situated in the hinterland of the Central Plains, there are profound historical and cultural factors. In 1988, huge quantities of rock paintings were discovered on the mountain, which not only filled the gap of the central Plains rock paintings, but also served as the culture and history of the Central Plains. From 2008 to 2009, archaeologists found that there are 126 symbols in these rock paintings, 43 of which have a high degree of agreement with the existing oracle inscriptions. At present, the research results of rock paintings in the Jutz Mountains are mainly focused on the interpretation of the connotation of rock paintings. In order to investigate the relationship between the symbolism and the existing oracle bone inscriptions, this paper makes a preliminary study on the symbolic form of the Tutzishan inscription, in order to investigate the relationship between the symbolic form and the existing oracle bone inscriptions. In this paper, we first compare the figurative symbols with oracle bone inscriptions. The simple contrast is not enough to show the necessary connection between them, because there is a lack of evidence chain between them, which is the focus of this paper. It is also a difficult point. Then, in the order of time, the article arranges the symbols of each site in the early periods of Henan Province, and compares them with the inscriptions of the Tutzshan Mountains, the oracle inscriptions, and probes into the symbols of the Takeshan Mountains. In the early period of Henan Province, symbols and oracle bone inscriptions had in common with the oracle bone inscriptions, whether they were related in the same vein or not. Whether they were historical documents or historical legends, they always connected Huangdi with Jutzishan and Xinzheng. In the Yellow Emperor period, there was a legend of Cangjie character creation. The historical period of Huangdi's activities recorded in the literature coincided with the period under investigation of the carved symbols of the Jutzishan Mountains. This paper fully considered the unique geographical environment of the mountain. Historical and cultural background and the nature of the times, from the two angles of diachronic and synchronic, and combined with the related philology, archaeology, historical legends, historical documents and other aspects of research results, A new way of thinking and method is provided for the exploration of the symbolic form of the Tutzhan. This paper takes the method of induction and comparison to carry out the preliminary exploration of the symbolic form of the picturing of the Tutz Mountain. In order to explore the relationship between characters and symbols in the early period of Henan Province, this paper provides a general context and new basis, fully demonstrates the philological value of the descriptive symbols of the Tutzshan Mountains, and presents a new understanding of the research on the shape of the symbols in the inscriptions of the Mt.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K877.49;H121

【相似文献】