秦“谳狱”补疑——以“岳麓书院藏秦简”为视角

发布时间：2018-03-25 17:17

本文选题：谳狱　切入点：当　出处：《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：秦时"谳狱"之"谳"除了有"疑狱上谳"之义,还有因事件的特殊性或者犯罪主体的特殊身份本级司法机关无权决断而上谳上级司法机关断决之义。根据《岳麓书院藏秦简(五)》(待出版)中秦令的内容,"当"作为一种独立的文书,有固定的格式,附在确定案情的"鞫"文书之后,多见于郡级上谳廷尉的狱案文书中;且这类案件中对于犯罪主体所适用的处罚没有疑义,而是由于其身份的特殊性,郡无权处理,需要廷尉或者皇帝来做最后的决断。
[Abstract]:In the Qin Dynasty, there was not only the meaning of "conviction in prison", but also the meaning of "conviction in prison". Also because of the particularity of the incident or the special identity of the subject of the crime, the judicial organs at the corresponding level have no right to make a decision and the higher judicial organs make a decision. According to the contents of the Qin Ling in the Tibetan slips of Qin (5) > (to be published) in the Yuelu Academy of Classics, "when" As a separate instrument, There is a fixed format that is attached to the "fiduciary" instrument for the determination of the case, and it is more commonly found in the prison case documents of court officers at the county level; and in such cases there is no doubt as to the punishment applicable to the subject of the crime, but rather because of the particularity of his identity, The county had no authority to deal with the matter, and it was for a lieutenant or an emperor to make a final decision.
【作者单位】：湖南大学岳麓书院;
【基金】：2016年出土文献与中国古代文明研究协同创新中心博士创新资助项目(CTWX2016BS015) 国家社科基金青年项目“秦律令及其所见制度新研”(17CZS056)
【分类号】：K877.5

【相似文献】