《阙特勤碑》南面铭文的作者与镌刻年代问题

发布时间：2018-04-10 23:08

本文选题：阙特勤 + 毗伽可汗　；参考：《学术月刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：《阙特勤碑》和《毗伽可汗碑》有大量雷同的文字,为什么同一段铭文会出现在两块不同的石碑上?它们又是在什么历史背景下镌刻的?这些问题,从未有学者提出来讨论过。通过对突厥文和汉文两种史料的对比研究,我们作了一些尝试性的探索,并得出了几点初步的结论。毗伽可汗在开元廿年作的《阙特勤碑》仅包括东面40行、北面13行和棱角处的纪年、落款。阙特勤碑建成之时,碑南面是空白,没有刻字。伊然可汗开元廿三年组织镌刻的《毗伽可汗碑》包括东面41行、东南棱角1行、南面15行和西南棱角落款。毗伽可汗碑建成之时,碑北面也是空白。直到开元廿八年登利可汗继位后,在唐朝李质的协助下,登利可汗在阙特勤碑南面和毗伽可汗碑北面的空白处,镌刻了同一篇铭文。文中突厥汗国人心涣散的境况,反映的正是登利可汗继位之时突厥汗国即将瓦解的局面。直到开元廿八年才刻成的阙特勤碑南面13行和毗伽可汗碑北面15行,都是出自登利可汗之口,后者比前者多出的几句是登利可汗引用其父亲临终前留下的原话。
[Abstract]:There are a lot of identical characters in the Tribune que and the Bichakhan. Why does the same inscription appear on two different stone tablets?In what historical context are they engraved?These problems have never been discussed by scholars.Through the comparative study of the historical materials of Turkic and Chinese, we have made some tentative explorations and drawn some preliminary conclusions.Pigakohan's Chronicles in Kaiyuan only include 40 lines in the east, 13 in the north and the year in the corner.When the que Teqin tablet was built, the south side of the monument was blank and there was no engraving.The inscription of Iran Khan Kaiyuan's twenty-three year organization includes 41 lines in the east, 1 line in the southeast corner, 15 lines in the south and 15 lines in the southwest corner.When the Piga Khan tablet was built, the north side of the monument was blank.Until 28 years after the reign of Denglikhan, with the help of Li in the Tang Dynasty, Denglikhan engraved the same inscription on the south side of the Quetagin tablet and on the north of the Vickakhakhan tablet.The disunity of Turkic khanate reflects the imminent disintegration of Turkic khanate.The 13 lines to the south and 15 lines to the north of the Pigakhakhan tablet, which was not carved until 28 years in Kaiyuan, were written by Denikhan, whose father quoted a few more lines from his father's deathbed words.
【作者单位】：上海大学文学院历史系;
【分类号】：K877.42

【相似文献】