论考古阐释与中国考古学实践

发布时间：2018-04-13 03:30

本文选题：考古阐释 + 考古学史　；参考：《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年06期

【摘要】：学术界一般把描述、解释和复原视为考古学不同研究层面上的三个主要目标。随着考古学研究的转型,考古阐释的方法、手段也在发生着变化。自现代考古学诞生以来,考古阐释的发展大致经历了进化论、传播论和迁徙论、文化功能研究、过程考古、后过程考古(阐释考古学)等几个阶段。国内的同类研究也经历了一个由自发到自觉的过程,从文化历史考古学向过程和后过程考古学研究并举的过渡中既有收获也有经验教训。在新的学术条件下,全面复原古代社会、重建古史的历史使命迫切需要以考古学为中心的多学科阐释方法、手段的不断进步。
[Abstract]:The academic circles generally regard description, interpretation and restoration as the three main objectives of archaeological research at different levels.With the transformation of archaeological research, the methods and means of archaeological interpretation are also changing.Since the birth of modern archaeology, the development of archaeological interpretation has generally experienced several stages, such as evolution theory, communication theory and migration theory, cultural function research, process archaeology, post-process archaeology (hermeneutical archaeology) and so on.The same kind of research in China has also experienced a process from spontaneous to conscious. The transition from cultural and historical archaeology to process and post-process archaeology has both harvest and experience.Under the new academic conditions, the historical mission of restoring the ancient society and reconstructing the ancient history urgently needs the archeology as the center of the multi-disciplinary interpretation method and the continuous progress of the means.
【作者单位】：郑州大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“地理信息系统支持下的鲁东南沿海地区聚落考古研究”(批准号:12CKG010) 河南省高等教育教学改革省级项目“数字技术下的考古专业创新教学模式研究”(批准号:2014SJGLX128)
【分类号】：K85

【参考文献】