白音长汗遗址废弃过程研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 13:16

本文选题：白音长汗遗址 + 遗址形成过程　；参考：《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：白音长汗遗址是辽西地区已发现并大规模发掘的重要遗址之一，遗迹多样——包括房址、墓葬、灰坑、壕沟；遗存时段丰富——包括小河西文化、兴隆洼文化、赵宝沟文化、红山文化以及小河沿文化。该遗址对研究中国辽西地区史前生计方式、生活状况、社会组织以及意识形态等方面具有极大的学术价值。遗址形成过程理论在美国已经有40多年的研究史，本文以遗址的废弃过程为主要切入点，，结合白音长汗遗址的发掘报告材料，分析该遗址的各个阶段房址的废弃过程。通过对白音长汗遗址五期七类遗存的房址居住面活动区观察、分析以及对比，结合遗址形成过程理论的原理，我们对白音长汗遗址的废弃方式与过程有了一定的认识。该遗址的废弃方式可以分成三类：第一类是有返回计划的、迅速的废弃，如二期乙类的房址；第二类是有计划返回的、缓慢的废弃，如赵宝沟文化时期的房址；第三类是没有返回计划的、彻底的废弃，如红山文化时期的房址。这些废弃方式上的区别可能与不断发展的定居能力有关，兴隆洼文化时期人们的定居能力还比较弱，人们可能需要较为频繁地暂时离开居址去狩猎采集某些资源，从而形成第一类废弃方式。到了赵宝沟文化时期，定居能力提高，人们离开居址的频率下降，但离开的时间可能延长，所以存在一定的离开前的收拾安置，从而形成第二类废弃方式。到了红山文化时期，定居能力进一步提高，人们可能无须季节性地离开居址，最后形成第三类废弃方式。通过废弃过程研究，我们可以从另一个角度来了解史前社会的发展状况。
[Abstract]:The Baiyinchang Khan site is one of the most important sites that have been discovered and excavated on a large scale in western Liaoning. The ruins are diverse including houses, tombs, ash pits, trenches, and there are plenty of remaining periods-including small Hexi culture, Xinglongwa culture, and Zhao Baogou culture. Hongshan culture and Xiaohe River culture. The site is of great academic value for the study of prehistoric livelihood, living conditions, social organization and ideology in western Liaoning. The theory of site formation process has been studied for more than 40 years in the United States. This paper takes the abandoned process of the site as the main breakthrough point and analyzes the abandoned process of the house site in each stage of the site by combining with the excavation report materials of the Baiyin Chang Khan site. Based on the observation, analysis and comparison of the living areas of the five periods and seven kinds of houses left at the Baiyinchang Khan site, combined with the theory of the formation process of the site, we have a certain understanding of the abandoned way and process of the Baiyin Chang Khan site. The abandoned ways of the site can be divided into three categories: the first type is rapidly abandoned with return plan, such as second stage B house site, the second kind is planned return, slowly abandoned, such as Zhao Baogou culture period house site; The third category is unplanned, completely abandoned, such as the Hongshan Cultural site. These differences in abandonment may be related to the growing ability to settle, which was weak during the Xinglongwa culture and may require people to leave their settlements for a while more frequently to hunt for certain resources. As a result, the first type of abandoned mode is formed. In the period of Zhao Baogou culture, the settlement ability was improved, the frequency of people leaving their residence decreased, but the time of leaving may be prolonged, so there is a certain arrangement before leaving, thus forming the second kind of abandoned way. In the period of Hongshan culture, the settlement capacity was further improved, people may not have to leave the residence seasonally, and finally form the third type of abandonment. Through the study of waste process, we can understand the development of prehistoric society from another angle.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：K878

【参考文献】