清华简《尹诰》篇题辨正

发布时间：2018-05-29 06:08

本文选题：清华简 + 《尹诰》　；参考：《齐鲁学刊》2016年05期

【摘要】：清华简编者把一篇简文题为《尹诰》,称它是"《尚书》中的一篇",是真"古文《尚书》"。这个说法,存在很多问题。历来《尚书》各本均无《尹诰》之篇名,清华简题名《尹诰》是误读《礼记》和郑注所致,《尹诰》简文根本不合《尚书》之"诰"体,且简文与历史事实充满着矛盾。有鉴于此,简文应该是战国时人编造的有关伊尹与汤事迹的习作。
[Abstract]:The editor of Qinghua Bamboo slips entitled Yin Letters, calling it "one of the Shang Shu" and the true "Ancient Chinese Book of Shang Shu". There are many problems with this statement. "Shang Shu" has no title of "Yin Letters". The title of "Yin Letters" is caused by misreading the Book of Rites and Zheng Note, and the "Letters Patent" is not in accordance with the "Letters Patent" of "Shang Shu", and it is full of contradictions with historical facts. In view of this, Jane Wen should be the work of Yi Yin and Tang made up during the warring States period.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院历史研究所;
【分类号】：K877.5

【相似文献】