夏商时期陶大口尊研究
发布时间:2018-06-05 19:30
本文选题:夏商时期 + 陶大口尊 ; 参考:《陕西师范大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文以出土的夏商时期陶大口尊资料为主,运用类型学、统计学、文化因素分析法等考古学方法,讨论了夏商时期陶大口尊的命名、型式、期段和年代、区域分布、功用等,最后就相关问题进行说明。全文共分六个部分: 绪论:介绍了学术界对陶器命名的原则以及陶大口尊的命名,对本文所考察的陶大口尊进行了界定和说明,简要介绍了本文的选题意义、研究方法及技术路线。 第一章:类型学分析。运用考古地层学、类型学原理,将大口尊分为3型12亚型及若干式。在此基础上,将夏商时期大口尊分为六期八段。一期为1、2段,相当于二里头文化二、三期。二期为3段,相当于二里头文化四期。三期为4、5段,相当于二里岗下层。四期为6段,相当于二里岗上层一期。五期为7段,相当于二里岗上层二期。六期为8段,相当于殷墟早期。总体来看,夏商时期大口尊一脉相承,没有明显缺环,经历了产生、发展、鼎盛、衰落和消亡等几个阶段。 第二章:大口尊的分布。夏商时期大口尊范围大致北到晋南,西达关中东部,南至长江流域,东到山东西部,与夏商王朝的统治区域密切相关。本文将大口尊的地域分布大致划分为8个类型,分别为二里头类型、杨庄类型、东下冯—台西类型、鹿台岗类型、二里岗类型、大城墩类型、白家庄类型和殷墟类型,呈现“一源多体”的分布格局。大致而言,大口尊的分布,体现着中原夏商文化向周围地区的拓展。 第三章:大口尊的功用。根据大口尊出现的时代背景、器形特征、出土数量、分布范围以及在古文字和历史文献中的体现,推测大口尊为夏商时期酿酒或储酒的专用陶器之一,与夏商时期酿酒业的发展及民众的饮酒习风有密切关系。 第四章:相关问题探讨。大口尊这一称谓存在同名现象。在史前及西周时期,均有同名大口尊陶器,但与本文大口尊并没有必然联系,属于不同时代的不同器类。同时在大口尊研究上,还存在诸如大口尊起源、刻划符号、陶质特性、制作工艺等需进一步解决的问题。 结语:对全文探讨的问题作了总结,并概括出四点认识。
[Abstract]:Based on the unearthed data of Tao Dakouzun in Xia and Shang dynasties, this paper discusses the naming, type, period and age, regional distribution, function and so on, using archaeological methods such as typology, statistics, cultural factor analysis, etc. Finally, the related issues are explained. The full text is divided into six parts: Introduction: this paper introduces the principles of naming pottery and the naming of Tao Daguzun in academic circles, defines and explains the Tao Daguzun inspected in this paper, and briefly introduces the significance, research methods and technical route of this paper. Chapter one: typology analysis. Based on the principles of archaeological stratigraphy and typology, Dakuzun is divided into 3 types and 12 subtypes and several types. On this basis, the Xia and Shang dynasties were divided into six periods and eight sections. The first stage is 1 and 2, which is equivalent to the second and third phases of Erlitou Culture. The second phase is three paragraphs, equivalent to the fourth stage of Erlitou culture. The third period is 4, 5, which is equivalent to the lower layer of Erli Gang. Four periods for 6, equivalent to the upper stage of Erligang. The fifth period is 7, which is equivalent to the second stage of the upper layer of Erligang. The sixth period is 8 paragraphs, equivalent to the early Yin ruins. In general, in the Xia and Shang dynasties, there was no obvious absence of ring, and it experienced several stages, such as generation, development, peak, decline and extinction. Chapter two: the distribution of Daguzun. During the Xia and Shang dynasties, the area of Daguzun was roughly north to the south of Shanxi, west to the east of Guanzhong, south to the Yangtze River basin and east to the western part of Shandong, which was closely related to the ruling region of the Xia and Shang dynasties. In this paper, the regional distribution of Dakuzun is roughly divided into eight types: Erlitou type, Yangzhuang type, Dongxia Fengtai type, Lutai gang type, Erligang type, Dachengdun type, Baijiazhuang type and Yin ruins type. The distribution pattern of "one source and many bodies" is presented. Generally speaking, the distribution of Daguzun reflects the expansion of the Xia and Shang culture in the Central Plains to the surrounding areas. Chapter three: the function of Daguzun. Based on the background of Dakuzun's emergence, the shape of the vessel, the number of excavations, the distribution range and the manifestation in ancient Chinese characters and historical documents, it is inferred that Dakou is one of the special pottery wares for wine making or wine storage in the Xia and Shang dynasties. It is closely related to the development of the liquor industry and the drinking habits of the people during the Xia and Shang dynasties. Chapter four: discussion on related problems. The name Daguzun has the same name. In the prehistoric and Western Zhou dynasties, there was the same name Daguzun pottery, but it was not necessarily related with this article, and belonged to different kinds of vessels in different times. At the same time, there are still some problems to be solved in the study of Daguzun, such as the origin of Daguzun, the engraving of symbols, the characteristics of pottery, and the manufacture process. Conclusion: this paper summarizes the problems discussed in this paper, and generalizes four points of understanding.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:K876.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高明;论陶符兼谈汉字的起源[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1984年06期
2 方向明;史前东方大口尊初论[J];东南文化;1998年04期
3 安金槐;;关于郑州商代二里岗期陶器分期问题的再探讨[J];华夏考古;1988年04期
4 ;郑州洛达庙遗址发掘报告[J];华夏考古;1989年04期
5 李昌韬;;郑州市木材公司商代遗址发掘简报[J];华夏考古;1990年04期
6 陈淑卿;山东地区商文化编年与类型研究[J];华夏考古;2003年01期
7 齐东林;鲁红卫;祝贺;李素婷;武志江;丁新功;;河南三门峡市南家庄遗址的调查与试掘[J];华夏考古;2007年04期
8 ;1995年郑州小双桥遗址的发掘[J];华夏考古;1996年03期
9 ;济南大辛庄遗址试掘简报[J];考古;1959年04期
10 蔡凤书;;济南大辛庄商代遗址的调查[J];考古;1973年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 郑铎;新石器时代大口尊研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2008年
2 付建;中原地区商代中期青铜礼器研究[D];陕西师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:1983161
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/1983161.html