国家起源研究中历史性事实对考古学证据意义形成的影响

发布时间：2018-06-16 06:05

本文选题：国家起源研究 + 历史性事实　；参考：《东南文化》2014年05期

【摘要】：虽然在国家起源研究中援用人类学概念和模式进行分析是必要的,但这些分析对个案研究有一定局限性,因此,需要重视个案的完整研究,尤其是对个案中国家形成和生存情况的长时段的历史性事实的关注。中国国家起源研究中对一些重要考古学证据意义的分析,运用的以物化证据标准衡量的方法还不具备真正的科学性,以此来认定考古学资料可能具有的表明国家存在的意义存在一些缺陷,需要重视历史性事实对于考古学证据意义形成的作用。在对近年学术界高度关注的重要的新石器时代晚期遗址意义的认定上,研究者应重视一些在中国早期历史发展中有重要意义的历史性事实的作用,如能直接表现国家制度运作的历史性事实、对于国家制度作为合法政治传统存在和发展的事实、国家制度发展的长期性后果等。
[Abstract]:Although it is necessary to use anthropological concepts and models for analysis in national origin studies, these analyses have some limitations on case studies, and therefore require attention to be paid to the complete study of individual cases. Particular attention is paid to the long-term historical facts of state formation and survival in individual cases. The analysis of the significance of some important archaeological evidence in the study of the origin of the country in China, the method used to measure the standard of materialized evidence is not truly scientific. Therefore, it is necessary to attach importance to the role of historical facts in the formation of archaeological evidential significance, which may indicate that there are some defects in the meaning of national existence. In the recognition of the significance of the late Neolithic sites, which have been highly concerned by the academic community in recent years, researchers should attach importance to the role of some historical facts of great significance in the early historical development of China. If we can directly express the historical facts of the operation of the state system, the fact that the state system exists and develops as a legal political tradition, and the long-term consequences of the development of the state system, etc.
【作者单位】：上海大学古代文明研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中国国家起源研究的理论与方法”(批准号:12&ZD133)的阶段性成果上海市教委一流学科(B类)建设计划上海大学世界史项目上海085社会学学科内涵建设科研项目资助
【分类号】：K871

【参考文献】