试论新安遗址第一期遗存
发布时间：2018-07-20 20:14
【摘要】：2009年发掘抚松新安遗址时,新发现一期早于渤海时期的遗存,暂命名为第一期遗存。它的发现填补了该地区考古发现的一项空白,也使学术界对新安遗址的时代和性质有了重新认识。本文通过对考古发掘材料的分析,对新安遗址第一期遗存的文化因素及性质等做一初步研究。
[Abstract]:When excavating the Fusong Xinan site in 2009, the first period was discovered earlier than the Bohai period, and was tentatively named as the first phase of the remains. Its discovery fills a gap in archaeological discovery in this area and makes the academic circles have a new understanding of the era and nature of Xinan site. Based on the analysis of archaeological excavations, this paper makes a preliminary study on the cultural factors and properties of the first phase of Xinan site.
【作者单位】： 吉林省文物考古研究所;
【分类号】：K878
本文编号：2134646
[Abstract]:When excavating the Fusong Xinan site in 2009, the first period was discovered earlier than the Bohai period, and was tentatively named as the first phase of the remains. Its discovery fills a gap in archaeological discovery in this area and makes the academic circles have a new understanding of the era and nature of Xinan site. Based on the analysis of archaeological excavations, this paper makes a preliminary study on the cultural factors and properties of the first phase of Xinan site.
【作者单位】： 吉林省文物考古研究所;
【分类号】：K878
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘玉成;关长春;杨俊峰;刘力;翟敬源;杜战伟;王乐文;于立群;高秀华;;吉林市龙潭山鹿场遗址发掘简报[J];北方文物;2014年01期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 武国勋;夫余王城新考——前期夫余王城的发现[J];黑龙江文物丛刊;1983年04期
2 马德谦;谈谈吉林龙潭山、东团山一带的汉代遗物[J];北方文物;1987年04期
3 李健才;;夫余的疆域和王城[J];社会科学战线;1982年04期
，本文编号：2134646
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2134646.html
