郑州大师姑城址研究
发布时间：2018-09-09 11:45
【摘要】： 本文根据郑州大师姑城址2002-2003年的考古发掘资料,在发掘者确定郑州大师姑城址是一座二里头文化晚期城址的基础上,着重分析了郑州大师姑城址中二里岗文化早期壕沟与二里头文化晚期城墙有机结合的关系,提出了郑州大师姑城址还是一座二里岗文化早期城址的新论点。根据大师姑二里岗文化早期城址取代大师姑二里头文化晚期城址的考古实际及对二里岗早期文化流与源的追溯‘,论证了大师姑二里岗文化早期城址为先商或早商文化城址,结合文献与相关学者.的研究成果,提出了郑州大师姑二里岗文化早期城址是商汤灭夏前所建韦亳的新观点,从地域和文化面貌上树立起了晚夏文化与先商或早商文化分界的有效界标。据此,分别探讨了夏商分界于偃师二里头文化二、三期之间、商汤灭夏前后曾分别居有南亳与北亳以及二里头遗址三期西亳说、偃师商城太甲桐宫说及郑州商城枮都说等学术观点的合理性,从而有可能为山穷水复中的夏商分界与汤亳问题研究送上一枝绿柳。 全文共分七部分：1.引言,叙述了夏商分界和汤亳问题研究的历程与现存的症结,探讨了目前打开症结的有效方法。2.概述了郑州大师姑二里头文化晚期城址形状、年代和性质。3.根据大师姑二里岗文化城壕与二里头文化城墙有机结合的考古资料,着重探讨了郑州大师姑城址还是一座二里岗文化早期城址。4.通过大师姑二里岗文化早期城址取代大师姑二里头文化晚期城址的年代、方式、性质的探讨,结合二里岗早期文化流与源的追溯,提出了大师姑二里岗文化早期城址商汤灭夏前韦亳说的新观点。5.分析了二里头三期宫殿、郑州商城和偃师商城界标说的局限性,探讨了大师姑二里岗下层一期城址夏商分界界标的有效性及对夏商分界问题研究的重要意义。6.探讨了大师姑二里岗下层一期城址夏商分界界标对商汤灭夏前曾居豫东商丘一带南亳和北亳、灭夏后又以二里头三期新建宫城为西亳、偃师商城为桐宫及郑州商城为枮都等学说合理性的重要意义。7.结语,重点指出了现有考古资料的局限性及今后研究中应注意的问题。
[Abstract]:Based on the archaeological excavations of the site of Zhengzhou Master Gu in 2002-2003, and on the basis of the determination by the excavator that the site of the Great Master of Zhengzhou is a site of late Erlitou culture, This paper analyses the relationship between the early trench of Erligang culture and the wall of late Erlitou culture in the site of Zhengzhou Master Gu, and puts forward a new argument that whether the site of Master Gu of Zhengzhou is an early site of Erligang culture. According to the archaeological practice of the early city site of guru Guerligang culture replacing the late stage of master Gulitou culture, and the tracing of the early cultural flow and source of Erligang culture, it is demonstrated that the early city site of Master Guerligang culture is the site of the pre-Shang or early Shang culture city. Combined with literature and related scholars. In this paper, the author points out that the early site of Guerligang culture of Zhengzhou Master is a new viewpoint that Wei Bo was built before Shang Tang destroyed summer, and set up an effective boundary between late summer culture and pre-Shang or early Shang culture from the aspect of region and culture. Based on this, the paper discusses the division of Xia and Shang between the second and third phases of Erlitou Culture in Yanshi, and the theory that before and after Shang Tang died, there lived in the south Bo and the north Bo and the third stage West Bo of Erlitou site, respectively. The rationality of academic viewpoints such as Taijia Tong Palace of Yanshi Shangcheng and Yu du of Zhengzhou Mall may send a green willow to the study of the distinction between Xia and Shang and Tang Bo in the recovery of mountains and rivers. The full text is divided into seven parts: 1. In the foreword, the paper describes the course and the extant crux of the research on the differentiation between Xia and Shang dynasties and the Tang Bo problem, and probes into the effective method of opening up the crux at present. 2. This paper summarizes the shape, age and nature of the late city site of Guerlitou Culture, a great master of Zhengzhou. Based on the archaeological data of the organic combination of Guerligang Culture City trench and the wall of Erlitou Culture, the author emphatically discusses whether the site of Master Gugu of Zhengzhou is an early site of Erligang culture. Through the discussion of the age, mode and nature of the early city site of the great guru Erligang culture replacing the late stage of the master Erlitou culture, combined with the tracing of the early cultural flow and the origin of Erligang, This paper puts forward a new viewpoint. 5. This paper analyzes the limitations of the boundary markers theory of Erlitou 3 Palaces, Zhengzhou Shang City and Yanshi Shang City, and probes into the validity of the Xia and Shang boundary markers at the lower stage of Master Guerligang and their significance to the study of the Xia and Shang boundaries. This paper discusses the boundary markers of the Xia and Shang divisions of the lower stage of Master Gu Erligang, which once lived in the southern and northern Bo area of Shangqiu area in eastern Henan before the end of the summer, and then took the new Miyagi city in Erlitou III as the west Bo after summer. Yanshi Shangcheng is the Tonggong and Zhengzhou Shangcheng is the capital. 7. In conclusion, the limitations of the existing archaeological data and the problems to be paid attention to in the future research are emphatically pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K878
本文编号：2232277
[Abstract]:Based on the archaeological excavations of the site of Zhengzhou Master Gu in 2002-2003, and on the basis of the determination by the excavator that the site of the Great Master of Zhengzhou is a site of late Erlitou culture, This paper analyses the relationship between the early trench of Erligang culture and the wall of late Erlitou culture in the site of Zhengzhou Master Gu, and puts forward a new argument that whether the site of Master Gu of Zhengzhou is an early site of Erligang culture. According to the archaeological practice of the early city site of guru Guerligang culture replacing the late stage of master Gulitou culture, and the tracing of the early cultural flow and source of Erligang culture, it is demonstrated that the early city site of Master Guerligang culture is the site of the pre-Shang or early Shang culture city. Combined with literature and related scholars. In this paper, the author points out that the early site of Guerligang culture of Zhengzhou Master is a new viewpoint that Wei Bo was built before Shang Tang destroyed summer, and set up an effective boundary between late summer culture and pre-Shang or early Shang culture from the aspect of region and culture. Based on this, the paper discusses the division of Xia and Shang between the second and third phases of Erlitou Culture in Yanshi, and the theory that before and after Shang Tang died, there lived in the south Bo and the north Bo and the third stage West Bo of Erlitou site, respectively. The rationality of academic viewpoints such as Taijia Tong Palace of Yanshi Shangcheng and Yu du of Zhengzhou Mall may send a green willow to the study of the distinction between Xia and Shang and Tang Bo in the recovery of mountains and rivers. The full text is divided into seven parts: 1. In the foreword, the paper describes the course and the extant crux of the research on the differentiation between Xia and Shang dynasties and the Tang Bo problem, and probes into the effective method of opening up the crux at present. 2. This paper summarizes the shape, age and nature of the late city site of Guerlitou Culture, a great master of Zhengzhou. Based on the archaeological data of the organic combination of Guerligang Culture City trench and the wall of Erlitou Culture, the author emphatically discusses whether the site of Master Gugu of Zhengzhou is an early site of Erligang culture. Through the discussion of the age, mode and nature of the early city site of the great guru Erligang culture replacing the late stage of the master Erlitou culture, combined with the tracing of the early cultural flow and the origin of Erligang, This paper puts forward a new viewpoint. 5. This paper analyzes the limitations of the boundary markers theory of Erlitou 3 Palaces, Zhengzhou Shang City and Yanshi Shang City, and probes into the validity of the Xia and Shang boundary markers at the lower stage of Master Guerligang and their significance to the study of the Xia and Shang boundaries. This paper discusses the boundary markers of the Xia and Shang divisions of the lower stage of Master Gu Erligang, which once lived in the southern and northern Bo area of Shangqiu area in eastern Henan before the end of the summer, and then took the new Miyagi city in Erlitou III as the west Bo after summer. Yanshi Shangcheng is the Tonggong and Zhengzhou Shangcheng is the capital. 7. In conclusion, the limitations of the existing archaeological data and the problems to be paid attention to in the future research are emphatically pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K878
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邹衡;偃师商城即太甲桐宫说[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1984年04期
2 安金槐;;关于郑州商代二里岗期陶器分期问题的再探讨[J];华夏考古;1988年04期
3 安金槐;;对于郑州商代南关外期遗存的再认识[J];华夏考古;1989年01期
4 蔡全法,马俊才;河南新密市古城寨龙山文化城址发掘简报[J];华夏考古;2002年02期
5 杨育彬;再论郑州商城的年代、性质及相关问题[J];华夏考古;2004年03期
6 靳松安 ,朱光华 ,张家强;豫东商丘地区考古调查简报[J];华夏考古;2005年02期
7 栾丰实;试论岳石文化与郑州地区早期商文化的关系──兼论商族起源问题[J];华夏考古;1994年04期
8 徐旭生;;1959年夏豫西调查“夏墟”的初步报告[J];考古;1959年11期
9 ;1959年河南偃师二里头试掘简报[J];考古;1961年02期
10 方酉生;;河南偃师二里头遗址发掘简报[J];考古;1965年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 刘绪;[N];中国文物报;2001年
2 河南省文物考古研究所 袁广阔;[N];中国文物报;2005年
，本文编号：2232277
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2232277.html
