当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 考古论文 >

论传世典籍中的官师与出土竹简中的大官之师

发布时间:2018-09-18 14:10
【摘要】:楚竹书《曹沫之阵》有"大官之师"一词,与将军、嬖大夫、公孙公子比次论列。论者多据《礼记·祭法》、韦昭《国语解》立说,以为大官之师即依礼得立一庙、身份阶层为士的"官师",由此形成对竹简文义及曹沫军事思想的错误判断。实际上,大官之师一词与古籍旧典中用来泛称一官之长、通常等同于大夫的"官师"义出一辙。而官师问题,本涉及学术史上的诸多公案,或因义解,或因文本,或因字诂,有必要就其原委得失做一系统梳理。在此基础上,进一步阐明官、大官与大夫阶层之关系以及官、爵、禄三者在考察标准上的是非异同,将有助于对相关简文及其隐含的军事思想形成更为透彻的理解。
[Abstract]:Chu Zhushu's "battle of Cao Mo" has the word "the teacher of a great official" and compares it with general, doctor-in-law and grandson. The term "teacher" is often used to refer to a general officer in ancient books, and is usually the same as the doctor's "official teacher". The question of "official teacher" originally involves many public cases in academic history, either because of meaning, or because of text, or because of character, it is necessary to sort out its original merits and demerits systematically. The similarities and differences in the criteria of investigation among the departments, the officials, the nobles and the officials will help to form a more thorough understanding of the relevant bamboo slips and their implied military thoughts.
【作者单位】: 湖南大学岳麓书院;
【分类号】:K877.5

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 ;前言[J];简牍学研究;1998年00期

2 ;前言[J];简牍学研究;1997年00期

3 ;前言[J];简牍学研究;2002年00期

4 ;前言[J];简牍学研究;2004年00期

5 廖名春;楚简《老子》“挍袭为上”考[J];烟台师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年03期

6 彭裕商;读楚简随记[J];考古与文物;2003年06期

7 yそ〈,

本文编号:2248162


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2248162.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5d003***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com