磨沟式陶器研究
发布时间：2018-11-20 14:50
【摘要】：甘肃临潭县磨沟遗址是近年来在洮河上游地区发现的一处重要的史前遗址,也是在甘青地区发现的唯一一处以竖穴偏室墓为主要形制的齐家文化墓地。墓地中发现了一批黑、灰色双耳罐为代表的陶器,部分与齐家文化陶器共存,其质地、颜色、器型都与齐家文化陶器有着明显区别,而与寺洼文化陶器相似,这一现象在初次发掘的时候就引起了注意,但没有专文进行研究。本文把这批陶器命名为“磨沟式陶器”,旨在将其与齐家文化陶器及稍后的寺洼文化陶器相区分。通过对磨沟式陶器构成及演变的考察,以及磨沟式陶器与齐家式、寺洼式陶器之间关系的对比分析,认为磨沟式陶器并非是由典型齐家式陶器演变而来,而是在磨沟墓地齐家文化晚期产生的一种新的器类,发展壮大而取代了齐家式陶器,进而演变为寺洼式陶器。含有这三种不同陶器的墓葬分析表明,随葬陶器不同但埋葬习俗基本没有改变,也就是使用同一种葬俗的人群是延续发展的。本文认为齐家文化向寺洼文化的转变形式是陶器面貌上的整体替代,而人群并未变迁,寺洼人才是真正的齐家人的延续；陶器组群的变化不能代表考古学文化就一定发生了改变,也不能说明人群在变迁,考古学文化也不能与人群相等同。
[Abstract]:Mogou site in Lintan County Gansu Province is an important prehistoric site found in the upper reaches of Tao River in recent years. In the graveyard, a batch of pottery represented by black and grey two-ear pots were found. Some of them coexisted with Qijia cultural pottery. The texture, color and type of pottery were obviously different from those of Qijia culture, but they were similar to those of Siwa culture. This phenomenon attracted attention at the time of initial excavation, but there was no dedicated research. In this paper, we name these pottery as "moat pottery" in order to distinguish it from Qijia culture pottery and later Siwa cultural pottery. Based on the investigation of the composition and evolution of the grooved pottery, and the comparative analysis of the relationship between the grinding groove type pottery and Qijia type, Siwa type pottery, it is concluded that the grinding groove type pottery did not evolve from the typical Qijia type pottery. But in the late period of Qijia culture in Mogou cemetery, a new kind of pottery was created, which developed and expanded and replaced Qijia pottery, and then evolved into Siwa type pottery. The analysis of the tombs containing these three kinds of pottery shows that the interment pottery is different but the burial custom has not changed basically, that is to say, the people who use the same burial custom continue to develop. This paper holds that the transformation form from Qi culture to Siwa culture is the overall substitution of pottery, but the crowd has not changed, and the talent of Siwa is the continuation of the true Qi family. The change of pottery group can not represent the change of archaeological culture, nor does it mean that the crowd is changing, and the archaeological culture can not be equal to the crowd.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K876.3
本文编号：2345197
[Abstract]:Mogou site in Lintan County Gansu Province is an important prehistoric site found in the upper reaches of Tao River in recent years. In the graveyard, a batch of pottery represented by black and grey two-ear pots were found. Some of them coexisted with Qijia cultural pottery. The texture, color and type of pottery were obviously different from those of Qijia culture, but they were similar to those of Siwa culture. This phenomenon attracted attention at the time of initial excavation, but there was no dedicated research. In this paper, we name these pottery as "moat pottery" in order to distinguish it from Qijia culture pottery and later Siwa cultural pottery. Based on the investigation of the composition and evolution of the grooved pottery, and the comparative analysis of the relationship between the grinding groove type pottery and Qijia type, Siwa type pottery, it is concluded that the grinding groove type pottery did not evolve from the typical Qijia type pottery. But in the late period of Qijia culture in Mogou cemetery, a new kind of pottery was created, which developed and expanded and replaced Qijia pottery, and then evolved into Siwa type pottery. The analysis of the tombs containing these three kinds of pottery shows that the interment pottery is different but the burial custom has not changed basically, that is to say, the people who use the same burial custom continue to develop. This paper holds that the transformation form from Qi culture to Siwa culture is the overall substitution of pottery, but the crowd has not changed, and the talent of Siwa is the continuation of the true Qi family. The change of pottery group can not represent the change of archaeological culture, nor does it mean that the crowd is changing, and the archaeological culture can not be equal to the crowd.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K876.3
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 安志敏;;甘肃远古文化及其有关的几个UO楲[J];考古通讯;1956年06期
2 夏鼐;;关于考古学上文化的定名问题[J];考古;1959年04期
3 吴汝祚;;甘青地区原始文化的概貌及其相互关系[J];考古;1961年01期
4 ;青海乐都柳湾原始社会墓地反映出的主要问题[J];考古;1976年06期
5 ;宝鸡竹园沟等地西周墓[J];考古;1978年05期
6 谢端琚;;论大何庄与秦魏家齐家文化的分期[J];考古;1980年03期
7 胡谦盈;;甘肃庄浪县徐家碾寺洼文化墓葬发掘纪要[J];考古;1982年06期
8 ;甘肃卓尼(艹也)儿遗址试掘简报[J];考古;1994年01期
9 樊维华;;(艹也)儿遗址文化性质初探[J];考古;1994年01期
10 ;甘肃古文化遗存[J];考古学报;1960年02期
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前2条
1 宋江宁;试论寺洼文化[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2001年
2 周静;磨沟齐家文化墓地分期分区及相关问题研究[D];西北大学;2010年
，本文编号：2345197
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2345197.html
