同源异途:清华简《书》类文献与儒家《尚书》系统的学术分野
发布时间：2018-12-17 18:52
【摘要】：学界多定清华简《赤鹄之集汤之屋》为战国小说文体,但根据竹简形制、简背刻画线、字体及文本内容,清华简《赤鹄》《尹至》《尹诰》可组成较为完整的叙事整体,因此不能排除它为《书》类文献的可能。清华简《赤鹄》小臣偷喝羹汤,为君臣生隙,互相猜忌;《尹至》伊尹、商汤盟誓,协同灭夏,为君臣互信达成。郑玄将《尹诰》"咸有一德"解释为君臣不互相猜忌,依然是不可推翻的学术定谳。清华简《书》类文献与《尚书》相比,篇名不同,篇目、篇数互有差异,没有《书序》,相同篇目传本不同,多言鬼神怪异,二者同源异流,很可能分属于不同的《书》类文献系统。
[Abstract]:Academic circles have decided that the Qing Hua Bamboo slips "the House of the gathering Soup of the Chihu" is the novel style of the warring States period, but according to the form of bamboo slips, the lines on the back of the bamboo slips, the font and the text content, the Qing Hua Bamboo slips "Chih-Hu" < Yin to > < Yin Letters > can form a relatively complete narrative whole. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that it is a kind of document. Qing Hua Jian < Chihu > Xiao Chen steals soup for monarch and minister, mutual suspicion; < Yin > Yi Yin, Shang Tang vows to destroy summer together, for monarch and minister to reach mutual trust. Zheng Xuan interpreted Yin Letters as "Xianyou Yi de" as an unrebuttable academic conviction if the monarch and minister were not suspicious of each other. Compared with "Shang Shu", the titles of different titles, and the number of articles are different, there are no "book prefaces", the same titles are different from each other, many words and ghosts are strange, and the two are homologous and different. It is very likely that they belong to different kinds of document systems.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学人文与传播学院;
【分类号】：K877.5
[Abstract]:Academic circles have decided that the Qing Hua Bamboo slips "the House of the gathering Soup of the Chihu" is the novel style of the warring States period, but according to the form of bamboo slips, the lines on the back of the bamboo slips, the font and the text content, the Qing Hua Bamboo slips "Chih-Hu" < Yin to > < Yin Letters > can form a relatively complete narrative whole. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that it is a kind of document. Qing Hua Jian < Chihu > Xiao Chen steals soup for monarch and minister, mutual suspicion; < Yin > Yi Yin, Shang Tang vows to destroy summer together, for monarch and minister to reach mutual trust. Zheng Xuan interpreted Yin Letters as "Xianyou Yi de" as an unrebuttable academic conviction if the monarch and minister were not suspicious of each other. Compared with "Shang Shu", the titles of different titles, and the number of articles are different, there are no "book prefaces", the same titles are different from each other, many words and ghosts are strange, and the two are homologous and different. It is very likely that they belong to different kinds of document systems.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学人文与传播学院;
【分类号】：K877.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马士远;;《书》在文学史上的地位摭谈[J];南京师范大学文学院学报;2010年02期
2 董治安;汉代《书》的承传与《书》学的演化——《两汉全书》编纂杂识之一[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
3 马士远;;试论秦代《书》学局面的新变[J];社会科学家;2008年09期
4 钱宗武;《说文》引《书》异文研究[J];益阳师专学报;1996年03期
5 马士远;;出土文献称说《书》及其篇名现象考论[J];齐鲁学刊;2007年03期
6 漆子扬;;甘肃历代《诗》《书》类古籍文献题录[J];兰州文理学院学报(社会科学版);2014年04期
7 李迪明;;“本之”试析[J];语文教学通讯;1991年11期
8 于植元;再说“尽信《书》则不如无《书》”[J];中国图书评论;1995年06期
9 蓝棣之;;含义丰富在深层——《书》赏析[J];语文学习;1992年06期
10 张荣明;《书》、《诗》中“哲”义小考[J];管子学刊;2005年01期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 ，
本文编号：2384654
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2384654.html
