当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 考古论文 >

湖南地区出土东周青铜兵器研究

发布时间:2019-01-04 22:41
【摘要】: 本文在全面收集湖南地区出土的东周兵器资料的基础上,对主要的兵器的型式进行了系统的整理。通过本文的整理,发现湖南地区出土的东周兵器形制演变清晰,依据其演变的特征,可将其分为三期;另外,笔者还发现湖南出土的青铜兵器具有鲜明的地域分布特点。在此基础上,结合相关文献,辨析出湖南境内东周时期曾存在有四个族群,即越族、濮族、楚族和巴族。进一步,探讨了楚国对湖南的开发,试图解析出楚族进入湖南到楚国将湖南纳入版图的整个过程。 文章共分五个部分: 第一部分:前言。包括本课题的学术意义,研究历史和现状,以及本文的基本研究方法。目前来看,大部分学者对湖南地区青铜兵器的研究,主要以带铭或带精美纹饰的器物研究为主,对于普通青铜兵器则关注不够,研究的兵器种类不够全面,类型学分析存在过于细分等不足。 第二部分:铜兵器出土情况及典型遗址分析。在回顾湖南东周青铜兵器的出土历程后,将这一过程分为两段,即第一个阶段为1949年至1976年;第二个阶段为1977年至今。本文选取5个典型墓葬遗址进行分析,所谓典型墓葬指的是那些出土铜兵器数量较多、器形丰富、伴有其他遗物较多且时代特征较为明显的墓葬群。这样有利于兵器型式的划分和分期断代的准确性。在选择典型墓葬遗址时,注意兼顾地域分布的特点,以有利后文分析。 第三部分:类型学分析。对湖南出土东周时期铜剑、铜戈、铜矛、铜镞、铜戟、铜殳、铜铍、铜弩机进行详细的类型学分析,并对每种兵器的演变趋势作一简单论述。 第四部分:分期、区域分布特点及相关问题探讨。在前面分析的基础上,对湖南出土的东周青铜兵器进行分期,可以分为三期:第一期为春秋早期到春秋中期;第二期为春秋晚期到战国早期;第三期为战国中晚期。接着对湖南出土东周青铜时空分布特点进行了分析,以此推出湖南东周时期的民族分布状况,进而探讨楚对湖南的开发进程。 第五部分:结语。对本文的研究进行总结,并指出文章的不足之处。
[Abstract]:On the basis of collecting the data of the Eastern Zhou weapons unearthed in Hunan province, this paper systematically arranges the main types of weapons. Through the arrangement of this paper, it is found that the evolution of the Eastern Zhou weapons unearthed in Hunan region is clear and can be divided into three periods according to its evolution characteristics. In addition, the author also finds that the bronze weapons unearthed in Hunan have distinct regional distribution characteristics. On this basis, combined with relevant literature, there were four ethnic groups in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty in Hunan, namely, Yue, Pu, Chu and Ba. Further, it discusses the development of Hunan by Chu, and tries to analyze the whole process of Chu nationality entering Hunan and bringing Hunan into the territory. The article is divided into five parts: the first part: preface. Including the academic significance of this topic, research history and present situation, as well as the basic research methods of this paper. At present, most scholars mainly study bronze weapons in Hunan, mainly with inscriptions or fine ornaments, but they pay less attention to common bronze weapons, and the types of weapons studied are not comprehensive enough. Typology analysis has some shortcomings, such as too much subdivision. The second part: copper weapon unearthed and typical site analysis. After reviewing the unearthed course of the bronze weapons of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty in Hunan Province, this process is divided into two sections: the first stage is from 1949 to 1976, and the second stage is from 1977 to present. In this paper, five typical burial sites are selected for analysis. The so-called typical tombs refer to those tombs which have more bronze weapons unearthed, rich in shape, with more other relics and obvious characteristics of the times. This is beneficial to the classification of weapon types and the accuracy of stages. In the selection of typical burial sites, attention should be paid to the characteristics of regional distribution. The third part: typology analysis. This paper makes a detailed typological analysis of copper swords, bronze gowns, bronze spears, bronze arrowheads, bronze halberds, copper-beryllium and copper crossbow machines unearthed in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty in Hunan Province, and makes a brief discussion on the evolution trend of each kind of weapon. The fourth part: the period, the regional distribution characteristic and the related question discussion. On the basis of the previous analysis, the bronze weapons unearthed in Hunan are divided into three stages: the first is from the early Spring and Autumn period to the middle of the Spring and Autumn period; the second is from the late Spring and Autumn period to the early warring States period; the third is the middle and late warring States period. Then, the characteristics of the temporal and spatial distribution of Eastern Zhou bronze unearthed in Hunan are analyzed, and the national distribution of Hunan Eastern Zhou Dynasty is deduced, and the process of Chu's development of Hunan is discussed. Part V: conclusion. This paper summarizes the research, and points out the shortcomings of the article.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K876.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前5条

1 龙福廷;湖南郴州发现随葬陶鬲的东周墓[J];华夏考古;1997年04期

2 何浩;殷崇浩;;春秋时楚对江南的开发[J];江汉论坛;1981年01期

3 曹学群;论湖广地区的越文化与杨越的关系——兼与朱建中同志商讨[J];南方文物;1993年03期

4 傅聚良;长江中游地区商时期铜器上的虎纹[J];南方文物;2005年02期

5 郭伟民;关于早期楚文化和楚人入湘问题的再探讨[J];中原文物;1996年02期



本文编号:2400886

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2400886.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4f993***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com