翁方纲《两汉金石记》研究
发布时间：2019-02-08 17:16
【摘要】： 翁方纲是乾嘉时期极为突出的学者,在经学、诗学、书志学、金石考据学及书法艺术等方面都有突出贡献。他是研究金石碑版学者中以考据、订正为重的金石学家,《两汉金石记》则是研究断代金石的开山之作。不仅是当前金石学研究的重要参考文献,清代金石学者对这部著作也给与了高度的肯定和赞赏,甚至有些金石学家会运用这些理论完成自己的著作。本文从翁方纲《两汉金石记》这部金石学文献着手,解读和领悟翁氏严谨求实、客观理性的研究精神和“多闻、阙疑、慎言”的学术方法。他做学问如做人,对结论的判定多方考证,眼见为实,从不执一家之言,这种性格使得他的著作结构严谨、内容丰富。因此它在金石学领域产生深远影响又是情理之中。 与以往金石文献研究仅局限于订正经史方面不同的是:该文从金石文字角度作为切入点来阐释文章的重点问题。首先阐述本文研究意义、研究现状和创新之处。第二章略述翁方纲本人生平和成书时所处的时代背景和学术氛围。本文的一个重点是通过对此部著作的详细研读后从中体会翁氏的学术研究方法。在这部金石记中,他的主要精力放在:对所搜集不同版本金石文字点画异同的详细辨析;对各个碑版阙失文字,碑文行数的易改都认真记录作注;从碑刻文字的凿痕,剥泐程度分析篆法、隶法体势转变等汉碑碣的诸多问题。本文研读的重点也是分析说明这几个问题。所以文章第三部分就翁方纲著金石记时所推崇的几种学术研究方法给予详细总结辨析。文章第四部分同第三部分一样是本文写作的另一个重点。写第四部分时,对此书的碑碣部分稍作调整,他是“以目所亲见为据,不复能依年次”来列举八十余种碑碣刻石,为了使文章条理清晰做论文时把汉碑石刻按时间顺序分为西汉刻石文字,东汉碑碣、摩崖、石阙、石经等形式进行阐述。启功先生曾说过,人们对汉碑石刻作专题研究时通常忽略了对写书立碑者、刻碑工的研究分析,他们是灿烂汉碑文化的第一创造者。本文也试图透过此书中对刻碑工、立碑书写者的考察略作一个系统的辩证研究。此部著作在金石学研究领域中所占的地位不容忽视,特别是它对金石文字研究的贡献最为突出,翁方纲写此书的目的也在于此,论文第五部分就列举论证金石文字对考证小学所提供的宝贵资料。
[Abstract]:Weng Fanggang was an outstanding scholar in Qianjia period. He made outstanding contributions to the study of classics, poetics, calligraphy, Jinshi textual research and calligraphy art. He was a scholar who studied the inscription of the stone tablet with textual research and revision, and the Book of the Stone in the Han Dynasty was the beginning of the study of the gold and stone of the dynasties. Not only is it an important reference document in the current study of petrology, but also the scholars of the Qing Dynasty gave a high degree of recognition and appreciation to this work, and even some scholars will use these theories to complete their own works. This paper begins with Weng Fanggang's the Book of Stone in the Han Dynasty, and interprets and understands Weng's rigorous, realistic and objective research spirit and academic method of "overhearing, doubting and careful speech". His knowledge, such as being a man, judging conclusions, seeing and believing, never holding to his own words, makes his writings rigorous and rich in content. Therefore, it is reasonable to have a profound influence in the field of petrology. Different from the previous researches on the history of Jinshi literature, this paper explains the key issues from the perspective of Jinshi script. First of all, this paper describes the significance of research, research status and innovation. Chapter two briefly describes the background and academic atmosphere of Weng Fanggang's life and writing. One of the key points of this paper is to understand Weng's academic research methods through a detailed study of this work. In this book of stone, his main energy is to distinguish and analyze the similarities and differences of the different versions of the inscriptions, to record carefully the changes in the number of lines of the inscriptions, and to make a careful note on the missing characters of each tablet version and the number of lines of the inscriptions, and on the analysis of the differences and similarities between the different versions of the inscriptions. This paper analyzes many problems of Han stele, such as seal character and the change of body force of Li method from the cutting mark of inscription and the degree of exfoliation. The focus of this study is also to analyze and explain these problems. So the third part summarizes and discriminates several academic research methods. The fourth part is another important part of this paper just like the third part. When writing the fourth part, he adjusted the stele part of the book slightly. He listed more than 80 stele steles "based on what he saw in person and no longer able to count according to the number of years." In order to make the article clear, the stone inscriptions of the Han Dynasty are divided into the Western Han Dynasty stone inscriptions, the eastern Han stele, the cliff, the stone que, the stone classics and so on. Qi Gong once said that people usually ignore the research and analysis of the writers and engravers of the Han stone inscriptions. They are the first creators of the splendid Han tablet culture. This paper also attempts to make a systematic dialectical study on the writers and authors of the inscriptions in this book. The position of this work in the field of petrology cannot be ignored, especially since it has made the most outstanding contribution to the study of the inscriptions of stone and gold. Weng Fanggang wrote this book for the same purpose. The fifth part of the paper enumerates the valuable materials provided by Jinshi characters to textual research primary schools.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K877
本文编号：2418608
[Abstract]:Weng Fanggang was an outstanding scholar in Qianjia period. He made outstanding contributions to the study of classics, poetics, calligraphy, Jinshi textual research and calligraphy art. He was a scholar who studied the inscription of the stone tablet with textual research and revision, and the Book of the Stone in the Han Dynasty was the beginning of the study of the gold and stone of the dynasties. Not only is it an important reference document in the current study of petrology, but also the scholars of the Qing Dynasty gave a high degree of recognition and appreciation to this work, and even some scholars will use these theories to complete their own works. This paper begins with Weng Fanggang's the Book of Stone in the Han Dynasty, and interprets and understands Weng's rigorous, realistic and objective research spirit and academic method of "overhearing, doubting and careful speech". His knowledge, such as being a man, judging conclusions, seeing and believing, never holding to his own words, makes his writings rigorous and rich in content. Therefore, it is reasonable to have a profound influence in the field of petrology. Different from the previous researches on the history of Jinshi literature, this paper explains the key issues from the perspective of Jinshi script. First of all, this paper describes the significance of research, research status and innovation. Chapter two briefly describes the background and academic atmosphere of Weng Fanggang's life and writing. One of the key points of this paper is to understand Weng's academic research methods through a detailed study of this work. In this book of stone, his main energy is to distinguish and analyze the similarities and differences of the different versions of the inscriptions, to record carefully the changes in the number of lines of the inscriptions, and to make a careful note on the missing characters of each tablet version and the number of lines of the inscriptions, and on the analysis of the differences and similarities between the different versions of the inscriptions. This paper analyzes many problems of Han stele, such as seal character and the change of body force of Li method from the cutting mark of inscription and the degree of exfoliation. The focus of this study is also to analyze and explain these problems. So the third part summarizes and discriminates several academic research methods. The fourth part is another important part of this paper just like the third part. When writing the fourth part, he adjusted the stele part of the book slightly. He listed more than 80 stele steles "based on what he saw in person and no longer able to count according to the number of years." In order to make the article clear, the stone inscriptions of the Han Dynasty are divided into the Western Han Dynasty stone inscriptions, the eastern Han stele, the cliff, the stone que, the stone classics and so on. Qi Gong once said that people usually ignore the research and analysis of the writers and engravers of the Han stone inscriptions. They are the first creators of the splendid Han tablet culture. This paper also attempts to make a systematic dialectical study on the writers and authors of the inscriptions in this book. The position of this work in the field of petrology cannot be ignored, especially since it has made the most outstanding contribution to the study of the inscriptions of stone and gold. Weng Fanggang wrote this book for the same purpose. The fifth part of the paper enumerates the valuable materials provided by Jinshi characters to textual research primary schools.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K877
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 付瑞杰;从翁方纲《行书轴》的考辨看其书学思想及其晚年碑帖书法观[D];陕西师范大学;2012年
，本文编号：2418608
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2418608.html
