“过度决定”与根本决定——阿尔都塞关于辩证法决定作用机制的解释及其意义

发布时间：2018-02-27 14:46

本文关键词： “过度决定” 辩证法阿尔都塞　出处：《马克思主义与现实》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："过度决定"是阿尔都塞对马克思的矛盾观和因果观的一种创造性解释,其目标在于将其与线性因果观和黑格尔哲学的表现因果观区分开来,同时又为科学所要求的因果性提供最低限度的保障。在阿尔都塞那里,"过度决定"与对马克思的"整体"观之深度解读联系在一起,表现为"复杂整体"的内在矛盾相互作用机制,"具体"便是许多决定作用"过度决定"的复杂结构整体。"归根结底意义上的决定作用"不是"过度决定"的事先的唯物主义保障,而正是后者实现的辩证形式。阿尔都塞"过度决定"思想对理解马克思的辩证法及其与黑格尔的关系具有重要意义,亦为我们理解复杂社会历史情境提供了卓越视角。不过,阿尔都塞的分析不仅存在着形式主义难题,而且也没有解决"归根结底意义上的决定作用"和"最终决定"的关系难题,并最终滑入了偶然性崇拜立场。
[Abstract]:"excessive decision" is a creative explanation of Marx's view of contradiction and causality, whose goal is to distinguish it from linear causality and Hegel's philosophy. In Althusser's case, "overdetermination" is associated with a deep interpretation of Marx's "holistic" view. "concrete" is the complex structural whole which determines the function of "excessive decision". "in the final analysis, the decisive role" is not the "over-decision" in advance. The materialistic guarantee of the. It is the dialectical form of the latter. Althusser's "excessive decision" thought is of great significance in understanding Marx's dialectics and its relationship with Hegel, and it also provides us with an excellent perspective in understanding complex social and historical situations. Althusser's analysis not only has formalistic problems, but also fails to solve the relationship between "decisive role in the final analysis" and "final decision", and finally slips into the position of chance worship.
【作者单位】：南京大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“城市哲学和城市批评史研究”[项目编号:11&ZD089]的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：A81

【相似文献】