马克思的私有财产批判思想及其当代意义研究
发布时间:2018-06-07 09:01
本文选题:马克思 + 私有财产批判思想 ; 参考:《西南大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:马克思的私有财产批判思想作为马克思主义哲学对现实世界批判的主要内容,是马克思批判资本主义制度和资本主义生产方式的前提和基础。马克思通过对资本主义条件下的商品、货币、分工和劳动等形式的批判进而达到消灭异化劳动条件下的私有财产。在当前的社会条件下,资本通过不同的方式和手段涌入中国,私有财产在社会财富中所占的比例日益增加,社会财富愈来愈集中在少数人手中,最终导致整个社会的贫富差距越来越大。因此,研究马克思的私有财产批判思想,对合理地解决我国社会财富的分配问题具有重大的意义。基于上述的思考,本文通过以下四个部分来展开论述: 导言,问题的提出和研究本论题的意义。剖析当前我国经济发展中所存在的收入分配不合理的问题,并引出文章的主旨,同时阐明研究马克思私有财产批判思想的理论意义和实践意义。 第一章,考察马克思私有财产批判思想的理论来源和发展历程。马克思的私有财产批判思想主要来源于近代资产阶级国民经济学家和空想社会主义者的私有财产批判思想。笔者通过分析他们的私有财产批判思想的不足和缺陷,从而指出和论证了马克思私有财产批判思想产生的科学性。 第二章,着重论述马克思私有财产批判思想的逻辑根据、基本内容和必然结论。马克思私有财产批判思想的逻辑根据是通过其创立的历史唯物主义、劳动价值理论而逐步形成的;马克思首先通过对私有财产的批判,逐步过渡到对当前资本主义生产方式和资本主义制度的批判;就马克思的私有财产批判思想的发展历程来看,它贯穿于马克思本人从早年到晚年长达四十年的理论研究中,其所涉猎的内容十分丰富;马克思对私有财产批判的必然结论是“公有制代替私有制”。 第三章,重点探讨马克思私有财产批判思想的当代意义。第一,针对我国特色社会主义建设中的私有财产“入宪”与中国不搞“私有化”的逻辑矛盾,追寻当代中国私有财产的未来归宿。第二,通过对马克思关于私有财产思想的文本解读,并结合我国当前私有财产所面临的实际问题,还原马克思私有财产批判思想的真正本质,按照马克思的理论诉求去阐释私有财产及其相关问题。第三,唤起人们对当代中国现实的热切关注,尤其是在特定历史时期能够以马克思的实践思维方式和社会历史理论来正确地指导我们目前所要亟待解决的重大现实问题。
[Abstract]:As the main content of Marxist philosophy criticizing the real world, Marx's critique of private property is the premise and foundation of Marx's critique of capitalist system and capitalist mode of production. By criticizing commodities, money, division of labor and labor under capitalist conditions, Marx achieved the elimination of private property under the condition of alienated labor. Under the current social conditions, capital flows into China through different ways and means. Private property accounts for an increasing proportion of social wealth, and social wealth is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few people. Eventually, the gap between the rich and the poor of the whole society is widening. Therefore, it is of great significance to study Marx's critique of private property to solve the problem of distribution of social wealth reasonably. Based on the above thinking, this paper discusses through the following four parts: Introduction, question raising and the significance of studying this topic. This paper analyzes the unreasonable income distribution existing in the current economic development of our country, and leads to the gist of the article, and expounds the theoretical and practical significance of studying Marx's critical thought of private property. The first chapter examines the theoretical source and development process of Marx's critique of private property. Marx's critique of private property mainly comes from the critique of private property of modern bourgeois national economists and utopian socialists. The author points out and proves the scientific nature of Marx's critique of private property by analyzing the shortcomings and defects of their critique of private property. The second chapter focuses on the logical basis, basic content and inevitable conclusion of Marx's critique of private property. The logical basis of Marx's critique of private property was gradually formed through the historical materialism and the theory of labor value founded by Marx. From the perspective of the development of Marx's critique of private property, it runs through Marx's 40 years of theoretical research from his early years to his later years. Marx's critique of private property concluded that "public ownership takes place of private ownership". The third chapter focuses on the contemporary significance of Marx's critique of private property. First, in view of the logic contradiction between "entering the Constitution" and "privatization" of private property in the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics, we should pursue the future destination of private property in contemporary China. Second, through the text interpretation of Marx's thoughts on private property, and combining with the actual problems faced by private property in our country, we can restore the real essence of Marx's critical thoughts on private property. According to Marx's theoretical demands to explain private property and its related issues. Third, arouse people's keen attention to the contemporary Chinese reality, especially in the specific historical period can correctly guide us with Marx's practical thinking mode and social history theory to solve the important practical problems that need to be solved urgently at present.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:A811
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丰子义;;马克思现代性思想的多维透视[J];理论参考;2007年10期
2 张有奎;郑建斌;;《1844年经济学哲学手稿》与现代性批判[J];大连干部学刊;2009年11期
3 崔战伟;;试论我国私有财产的法律保护[J];法制与社会;2009年09期
4 张爱丰;;马克思主义经典作家论私有财产[J];甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版);2007年06期
5 张培培;;马克思的现代性批判——以《1844年经济学哲学手稿》为例[J];中共济南市委党校学报;2008年01期
6 李慧凤,刘志英;《马克思主义经济学史》评介[J];经济评论;1996年05期
7 陈正权;劳动扬弃资本——《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的私有制批判[J];集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年02期
8 营文中;;论我国私有财产权的合宪性及其意义[J];理论导刊;2008年12期
9 胡绪明;陈学明;;卢卡奇对现代性批判的基本路向及价值[J];理论探索;2007年01期
10 康渝生;;“拥有财产性收入”与“消灭私有制”——科学社会主义的哲学辨正[J];理论探讨;2008年04期
,本文编号:1990619
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/1990619.html