马克思政治解放批判的逻辑后果及其现实意义

发布时间：2018-06-18 02:50

本文选题：马克思 + 政治解放批判　；参考：《理论月刊》2017年12期

【摘要】：布鲁诺·鲍威尔将人的解放归结为政治解放,其实质是市民社会从专制政治中的摆脱,他没有看到政治解放的世俗基础——市民社会的内在缺陷。马克思对鲍威尔政治解放观的批判针对的是其市民社会立脚点,这一批判的逻辑后果是引发马克思对人的解放立脚点的重新设定,这在《论犹太人问题》中表现为"类存在物"概念,而在《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》中则被明确提升为"人类社会"。这一重新设定的意涵是,个体只有建立一种自觉的为他性、在团结合作与互惠互利中促进彼此发展,才能真正成为自由全面发展的人,人的解放才能真正实现。对这一逻辑结果的阐释,为人们深入理解贯彻"人类命运共同体"理念、缓和当代复杂紧张的国际局势提供了有益的借鉴和启示。
[Abstract]:Bruno Powell attributed the liberation of human beings to political emancipation, whose essence was to get rid of civil society from autocratic politics. He did not see the secular foundation of political liberation-the inherent defect of civil society. Marx's criticism of Powell's view of political liberation is aimed at his civil society's foothold. The logical consequence of this criticism is to trigger Marx's re-establishment of the standpoint of human liberation. This is manifested as the concept of "kind of being" in "on the Jewish problem", but it is clearly elevated to "human society" in the outline of Feuerbach. The implication of this re-establishment is that only by establishing a self-conscious otherness and promoting each other's development in solidarity, cooperation and mutual benefit, can individuals truly become people who develop freely and in an all-round way, and the liberation of human beings can be truly realized. The explanation of this logical result provides a useful reference and enlightenment for people to deeply understand and carry out the concept of "human destiny community" and to ease the complicated and tense international situation.
【作者单位】：吉林大学哲学社会学院暨哲学基础理论研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目(12AZD003) 吉林大学研究生创新基金资助项目(2017046)
【分类号】：A811

【相似文献】