论《神圣家族》的人道主义思想
[Abstract]:The full name of the Holy Family is the Holy Family, or the critique of criticism. "refuting Bruno Powell and his Partners." it is the first work of the cooperation of young Marx and Engels. It criticizes speculative idealism from many angles and contains humanitarianism in the way of argumentation. The title of this paper is "on humanitarianism in the Holy Family", in which "Holy Family" is a key point and humanitarianism is another key point. One of the core problems to be solved in this paper is to start with the criticism of the Holy Family in three aspects: philosophy, economy and society, and according to Marx and Engels' thoughts before the first cooperation. The humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family is drawn, and the uniqueness of the humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family is sought. In addition, I combine the humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family with the present reality, think about its inheritance and transcendence to the past humanitarian thought, and talk about its enlightening significance to the reality. In the first chapter, the author will explain the basis, research problems and methods, literature review and significance of the topic. The most important thing is to sum up one's own views on humanitarianism and make preliminary preparations for the interpretation of humanitarianism in the Holy Family. In the second chapter, the author will sort out the thoughts of Marx and Engels before the Holy Family is written in order to better understand the text. In the third chapter, the author interprets the humanitarianism thought in the Holy Family from three angles. The first section is interpreted from the angle of philosophical criticism, which includes three aspects: the critique of speculative idealism, the critique of idealist view of history and the philosophical criticism combined with the book "Secrets of Paris"; The second section, from the angle of economic criticism, includes two aspects: the analysis of the word "alienation" and the comments on the political economy of Buluton, and the third section, which includes two aspects from the angle of social criticism. It was a statement of socialism and a succession to Feuerbach. In the fourth chapter, the author summarizes the characteristics and enlightenment of humanitarianism in the Holy Family.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:A811
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶先闯;;论《神圣家族》中的历史唯物主义思想[J];科教文汇(下旬刊);2009年06期
2 付文军;;建国以来《神圣家族》研究综述[J];传承;2011年17期
3 孙述娟;翟晓青;;浅析马克思恩格斯《神圣家族》的内容及其作用意义[J];商品与质量;2012年S6期
4 崔绪治;;友谊的结晶 事业的开端——读马克思、恩格斯的《神圣家族》[J];江苏师院学报;1981年01期
5 王长里;《神圣家族》和历史唯物主义的形成[J];江西社会科学;1983年05期
6 郑又成;向生产关系概念的接近──《神圣家族》学习札记[J];武陵学刊;1996年05期
7 赵民;要有“使用实践力量的人”——《神圣家族》的特殊贡献[J];社科纵横;1998年04期
8 李锐;;《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》与《神圣家族》的关系再探析[J];世纪桥;2010年03期
9 赵民;岳海云;;要有“使用实践力量的人”——《神圣家族》对马克思主义哲学史的特殊贡献[J];甘肃社会科学;2010年01期
10 戴生岐;;《神圣家族》的人本性意蕴和社会主义价值诉求[J];宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 聂锦芳;如何解读《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》[N];光明日报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 段钧元;论《神圣家族》的人道主义思想[D];山东大学;2017年
2 钟锡进;《神圣家族》的伦理思想探析[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
3 林琳;论马克思《神圣家族》一书对近代形而上学的批判[D];黑龙江大学;2008年
4 朱凯;人的现实自由之路[D];中共四川省委党校;2012年
5 孙祺;批判工作的历史性推进[D];吉林大学;2012年
,本文编号:2162918
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2162918.html