西方学者对马克思主义人之教育与发展思想的争论及启示

发布时间：2018-08-17 12:59

【摘要】：人存活于世,面临的困顿很多。人是充满理性和非理性的动物,但理性与非理性的关系如何,二者的界限划分是清晰的吗?何为人的教育与发展?人的生命过程又与自然发生着怎样的关系?本期专题讨论着重围绕以上话题展开。我们认为,理性与非理性远不是那么界限分明,因为它们存在着自我解构的可能性,即存在着走向其反面的可能,它们甚至是可以相互过渡的。理性与非理性仅是两个不同的视角,而非两种不同的存在;通过对当代西方学者在马克思主义人文教育与发展思想的研究中呈现出的从解释转向批判的研究取向,以及多元化视角的研究特点,指出了其在理论和实践中的局限,为我们深化教育改革、促进人的全面发展的理论研究工作提供了新思路;紧密结合当前"重返浪漫主义"的学术热点,对浪漫主义最重要的代表人物之一的萨缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治的生命理论进行深入观照,并运用当代生态批评的视角赋予该理论以现代生态内涵。三篇文章从不同角度对我们的生命存在进行理论探讨,目的是发现我们存在的意义、价值,破解人生的困顿。
[Abstract]:People live in the world and face a lot of difficulties. Man is an animal full of reason and irrationality, but what is the relationship between reason and irrationality, and is the demarcation between them clear? What is human education and development? What is the relationship between human life process and nature? This issue focuses on the above topics. We believe that rationality and irrationality are far from so distinct, because they have the possibility of self-deconstruction, that is, the possibility of going to the opposite, and they can even transition to each other. Rationality and irrationality are only two different perspectives, not two different existences. It also points out its limitations in theory and practice, and provides a new way for us to deepen the educational reform and promote the all-round development of human beings. Closely combined with the current academic hotspot of "returning to Romanticism", the life theory of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of the most important representative figures of Romanticism, is deeply studied. And use the contemporary ecological criticism perspective to endow the theory with modern ecological connotation. The purpose of this paper is to find out the meaning and value of our existence and to solve the difficulties of life.
【作者单位】：华南理工大学思想政治学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学专项基金项目(12JDSZK045)
【分类号】：A81

【相似文献】