论《资本论》中的异化、物象化与抽象的关系问题

发布时间：2018-09-01 20:28

【摘要】：应当从资本逻辑批判的视角出发,辨析物象化、异化和抽象的区别与联系,把握其整体关系与共同根源。物象化与异化的概念差异并不等于二者在现实中是截然分开的。在资本主义生产方式基础上,异化与物象化结成了彼此关联、不可分割的整体即异化—物象化。物象化与抽象都发源于资本逻辑中的具体化和抽象化过程:在资本主义生产中,资本关系具体化为可感觉的物象或物本身,同时也抽象化为超感觉的价值。异化、物象化与抽象是彼此联系、紧密交织在一起的,形成了异化—物象化—抽象三位一体结构。其整体性根源正是资本逻辑。一方面,异化、物象化与抽象发源于资本主义生产方式,是资本逻辑的表现形式和社会效应;另一方面,异化、物象化和抽象又构成了资本逻辑进行社会再生产的关键机制。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the criticism of capital logic, we should differentiate and analyze the differences and relations between materialization, alienation and abstraction, and grasp its whole relationship and common root. The difference between the concept of materialization and alienation does not mean that the two are completely separated in reality. On the basis of capitalist mode of production, alienation and materialization are related to each other. Both materialization and abstraction originate in the process of concretization and abstraction in the logic of capital: in capitalist production, capital relations are concretely transformed into perceptible objects or objects themselves, but also abstracted into super-sensational values. Alienation, objectification and abstraction are closely intertwined with each other, forming the structure of alienation-objectification-abstract trinity. Its whole root is the logic of capital. On the one hand, alienation, materialization and abstraction originated from capitalist mode of production, which is the manifestation and social effect of capital logic; on the other hand, alienation, materialization and abstraction constitute the key mechanism of social reproduction of capital logic.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学马克思主义学院、马克思主义研究院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“《资本论》的历史唯物主义思想及其当代价值研究”[项目编号:12XNJ013]的研究成果
【分类号】：A811

【相似文献】