朗西埃眼中的《1844年经济学哲学手稿》与《资本论》

发布时间：2018-10-11 07:23

【摘要】：在1965年法文第一版《读〈资本论〉》中,朗西埃的文章《批判概念与政治经济学批判:从〈1844年手稿〉到〈资本论〉》紧接着阿尔都塞的序言式文章《从〈资本论〉到马克思的哲学》排在第二篇,但却在《读〈资本论〉》1968年再版时被阿尔都塞删除了,因此在我国学界和英语学界所熟悉的《读〈资本论〉》一书中我们看不到朗西埃的这篇文章。朗西埃在这篇文章中,表现出与阿尔都塞不同的独特见解。朗西埃对《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的解读,虽然带有阿尔都塞结构主义的框架和“有罪阅读”方法的认识论导向,但他用独特的论证方式对马克思的这一文本进行了细致的解读和思想史定位。朗西埃在分析《资本论》中的科学问题式时,一方面应用了阿尔都塞的结构主义的观念,另一方面又借用了米勒的拉康式精神分析概念——“转喻因果”概念,并结合马克思所使用概念,如形式、核心格式塔、完形格式塔等,将它们糅合到自己的分析中去,体现出许多超出阿尔都塞的地方。
[Abstract]:In the first French edition of "Capital" in 1965, Longsier's essay "critical Concepts and critique of political economy: from manuscripts of 1844 to" on Capital "is followed by Althusser's preface," from Capital to Marxist philosophy, "in the second place." But it was deleted by Althusser when he reprinted Capital in 1968, so we can not see this article by Longsier in the book "read Capital", which is familiar to both Chinese and English scholars. In this article, Lonsier presents a unique view different from that of Althusser. Lonsier's interpretation of the manuscripts of Economics and philosophy of 1844, though with the framework of Althusser's structuralism and the epistemological orientation of the "guilty Reading" method, However, he interprets Marx's text in detail and orientates the history of thought with his unique argumentation. In analyzing the scientific problem form in Capital, Lonsier applies Althusser's concept of structuralism on the one hand, and borrows Hans Muller's concept of Lacan psychoanalysis on the other, the concept of metonymy causality. Combined with the concepts used by Marx, such as form, core gestalt, and so on, they are mixed into their own analysis, reflecting many places beyond Althusser.
【作者单位】：南京大学哲学系;

【相似文献】