马克思的社会所有制理论研究
发布时间：2018-11-08 13:09
【摘要】：马克思的社会所有制，指的是劳动者在全社会范围内对生产资料的共同占有，人与人之间对生产资料的关系不存在任何区别，劳动者与所有者合二为一。在马克思恩格斯的著作中，关于“社会所有制”许多不同的表述或提法在实质上是一样的，指的都是社会所有。实现社会所有制的前提条件是社会生产力的高度发达；实践中经济文化落后的社会主义国家，由于生产力发展并不充分，还远远不具备实现社会所有制的条件。在未来社会，实行社会所有制的必然结果是无商品和货币、无阶级和国家。现实实践中的社会主义实际上是仍然处于马克思讲的“过渡时期”的社会主义，并非马克思的共产主义第一阶段；在社会主义发展的现阶段，存在和发展商品经济、存在阶级和国家并不违背马克思的逻辑。马克思所讲的社会所有制，，不存在“全民”与“集体”两种形式的区别，更不存在“公有制的多种实现形式”；而股份制只是向社会所有制的一个过渡点，私有制更与社会所有制风牛马不相及。深入学习和研究马克思的社会所有制理论，对区别“过渡时期的公有制”与“社会主义社会的公有制”、深入认识我们目前所处的发展阶段、澄清各种理论混乱、更好地建设中国特色社会主义具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。
[Abstract]:Marx's social ownership refers to the joint possession of the means of production by the laborer in the whole society. There is no difference in the relationship between the people and the means of production, and the laborer and the owner are one. In Marx and Engels' works, many different expressions or formulations of "social ownership" are essentially the same, referring to social ownership. The prerequisite for the realization of social ownership is the highly developed social productive forces, and the socialist countries with backward economy and culture in practice are far from having the conditions to realize social ownership because the development of productive forces is not sufficient. In the future, the inevitable result of social ownership is no goods and money, no class and no state. In reality, socialism in practice is still in the "transitional period" as Marx called it, not the first stage of Marx's communism. At the present stage of socialist development, the existence and development of commodity economy does not violate Marx's logic. There is no difference between "the whole people" and "collectivity" in the social ownership mentioned by Marx, let alone the "various forms of realizing public ownership". The stock system is only a transition to social ownership, private ownership and social ownership is different. To deeply study and study Marx's theory of social ownership, to distinguish between "public ownership in the transitional period" and "public ownership in the socialist society," to deeply understand the stage of development we are currently in, and to clarify the confusion in various theories. Better construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics has important theoretical value and practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：A811
本文编号：2318596
[Abstract]:Marx's social ownership refers to the joint possession of the means of production by the laborer in the whole society. There is no difference in the relationship between the people and the means of production, and the laborer and the owner are one. In Marx and Engels' works, many different expressions or formulations of "social ownership" are essentially the same, referring to social ownership. The prerequisite for the realization of social ownership is the highly developed social productive forces, and the socialist countries with backward economy and culture in practice are far from having the conditions to realize social ownership because the development of productive forces is not sufficient. In the future, the inevitable result of social ownership is no goods and money, no class and no state. In reality, socialism in practice is still in the "transitional period" as Marx called it, not the first stage of Marx's communism. At the present stage of socialist development, the existence and development of commodity economy does not violate Marx's logic. There is no difference between "the whole people" and "collectivity" in the social ownership mentioned by Marx, let alone the "various forms of realizing public ownership". The stock system is only a transition to social ownership, private ownership and social ownership is different. To deeply study and study Marx's theory of social ownership, to distinguish between "public ownership in the transitional period" and "public ownership in the socialist society," to deeply understand the stage of development we are currently in, and to clarify the confusion in various theories. Better construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics has important theoretical value and practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：A811
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 石镇平;;马克思主义经典作家过渡时期长期性思想研究[J];理论学刊;2007年04期
2 智效和;;论重建个人所有制与股份制问题[J];理论学刊;2007年09期
3 谢韬;辛子陵;;试解马克思重建个人所有制的理论与中国改革[J];炎黄春秋;2007年06期
本文编号：2318596
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2318596.html
