百余年来对恩格斯晚年社会历史观的误读及解析

发布时间：2018-12-18 18:02

【摘要】：恩格斯晚年的社会历史观是马克思主义理论的重要内容,同时也是自20世纪以来马克思主义学者开始重新诠释的重要理论。但是,从恩格斯去世起,特别是20世纪后半期,针对他晚年的社会历史观,恩格斯形象被沉沦为"经济决定论者""物质论者""机械论者""民主社会主义者"等,从而被认为其思想与马克思相左。对这些误读,可从三个方面来进行解析:第一,在对待经济基础的作用上,恩格斯晚年在承认社会各因素在社会中起作用的基础上突出了其"归根到底"的作用;第二,在对待人的作用上,恩格斯在强调人创造历史的基础上指出人是经济"归根到底"决定作用发生的媒介;第三,在无产阶级革命策略方面,恩格斯坚持了无产阶级革命的理论和策略,同时又根据时代的变化指出暴力革命不是唯一的、普遍的手段但却是其他任何手段实施的有力保障。
[Abstract]:Engels' view of social history in his later years is not only an important part of Marxist theory, but also an important theory reinterpreted by Marxist scholars since the 20th century. However, since Engels died, especially in the second half of the 20th century, Engels' image has been reduced to "economic determinist", "materialist", "mechanist", "democratic socialism" and so on. Thus it was thought that his thought was contrary to Marx's. These misreading can be analyzed from three aspects: first, in the treatment of the economic basis, Engels in his later years in the recognition of the social factors in the society on the basis of its "in the final analysis" of the role; Secondly, on the basis of emphasizing that man creates history, Engels points out that man is the medium of economic "final analysis". Third, in terms of the revolutionary strategy of the proletariat, Engels adheres to the theory and strategy of the proletarian revolution, and at the same time points out that violent revolution is not the only one according to the changes of the times. Universal means, but it is any other means of implementation of the strong guarantee.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学政治与行政学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDA004)
【分类号】：A811

【共引文献】