“内在性自由”:马克思对卢梭遗产的转化及其启示
发布时间：2019-04-04 16:02
【摘要】：从海德格尔存在论出发阐释马克思的哲学革命,是当今马克思主义哲学界较为常见的一种做法。但这一做法存在显而易见的困难是:任何一种独立的规范维度均难以在"存在论"中获得有效承认。有鉴于此,我们主张回到卢梭的"自由"遗产深入梳理马克思对经由黑格尔而上溯至卢梭的"内在性自由"遗产的继承及转化,从而呈现出下述不同理解——相较于海德格尔以生存的历史境域全部折断形而上学的翅膀不同,马克思在告别近代内在性哲学的同时,坚决且明确地保留了卢梭的内在性自由这一价值维度。故此,马克思哲学革命的阐释,必须与一种纯全意义上的海德格尔存在论诠释路径坚决区别开来。
[Abstract]:Starting from the theory of Heidegger's ontology, it is a common practice in the Marxist philosophy world to explain the philosophical revolution of Marx. The obvious difficulty in this approach is that any independent normative dimension is difficult to achieve in the "Existentialism". In view of this, we advocate to return to the "free" heritage of Rousseau, and in-depth combing Marx's inheritance and transformation of the "inner free" heritage that goes back to Rousseau through Hegel, As a result, in comparison with Heidegger's all-breaking of Metaphysics's wings in the historical context of the existence of Heidegger, Marx, at the same time, firmly and clearly reserves the value dimension of the inner freedom of the Rousseau at the same time of saying goodbye to the modern inner-nature philosophy. Therefore, the interpretation of the Marx's philosophical revolution must be distinguished from a pure sense of Heidegger's theory of ontology.
【作者单位】： 中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所;中山大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“历史唯物主义的现实观研究”(15AZX002) 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“哈贝马斯政治哲学与康德政治哲学关系研究”(GD14XZX07)
【分类号】：A811
，
本文编号：2453966
[Abstract]:Starting from the theory of Heidegger's ontology, it is a common practice in the Marxist philosophy world to explain the philosophical revolution of Marx. The obvious difficulty in this approach is that any independent normative dimension is difficult to achieve in the "Existentialism". In view of this, we advocate to return to the "free" heritage of Rousseau, and in-depth combing Marx's inheritance and transformation of the "inner free" heritage that goes back to Rousseau through Hegel, As a result, in comparison with Heidegger's all-breaking of Metaphysics's wings in the historical context of the existence of Heidegger, Marx, at the same time, firmly and clearly reserves the value dimension of the inner freedom of the Rousseau at the same time of saying goodbye to the modern inner-nature philosophy. Therefore, the interpretation of the Marx's philosophical revolution must be distinguished from a pure sense of Heidegger's theory of ontology.
【作者单位】： 中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所;中山大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“历史唯物主义的现实观研究”(15AZX002) 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“哈贝马斯政治哲学与康德政治哲学关系研究”(GD14XZX07)
【分类号】：A811
，
本文编号：2453966
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2453966.html
