马克思人与自然关系理论的多维审视
[Abstract]:The theory of the relationship between man and nature is one of the main lines of Marx's philosophical thought. In the analysis of the relationship between man and nature, Marx transcends the simple contradiction between the natural naturalism of human "exclude" and the natural humanism on the nature of human's "put in". It is based on the existence of man and nature, and analyses the real, realistic and ideal relationship between man and nature. Although Marx did not have a special book on the title of ontology, he provided a body that existed independently and naturally. On this point of affirmation and nature, Marx inherited the thought of the humanism and naturalism of Ferbha directly, but the place of him beyond the Fairbaha lies in that it is not based on the perceptual intuition or the feeling of the human being, but based on the emotional activity of the human being. To understand and grasp the perceptive person and nature and their cross-correlation On the basis of the alienation of the practical way (labor), the existence of the man and nature of the reality is stored in a dissimilatory way. In the existence of the ideal man and nature, the communist movement of the private property and the alienation of labor can only be realized Now, the relationship between the two independent and existing perceptual entities of Marx and nature is the basis of the establishment of the human's practical activities. On the basis of the relationship between man and nature, Marx has made the essential meaning of the practice, and starts with the general definition of the practice concept, and analyzes the basic form of the practice in the theory of the relationship between man and nature, that is, the life Marx emphasized that the practical relationship between man and nature has entangled the social relations between man and man, and has changed constantly with the development of human society, so that the relationship between man and nature is given to the society In that opinion of Marx, human is carry on material, energy and information with nature through production practice. But in the real capitalist society, because of the mode of production of the private ownership of the capitalist means of production, the material transformation in the course of material transformation between the natural and the human and the society The crack of this kind of material transformation is brought by the capitalist system itself, so it can't In order to repair the cracks, the rational adjustment of the material transformation can only carry out the social revolution, change the capitalist system, and establish a new type of society which is in line with the large-scale production of the socialization, that is, the co-production main In Marx's field of view, the relationship between man and nature is not only a kind of practical relation, but also a kind of understanding relation. In the course of carrying out the practical activities of nature, people are also getting the natural and human In Marx's view, the person's knowledge of nature is the person's understanding of himself, that is, by nature The self-knowledge of human beings can be recognized and grasped in various forms, such as the feeling, the art, the natural science and so on. The process of people's understanding and understanding of nature is a process of historical development. In the capitalist mode of production, the alienation of the mode of practice (labor) inevitably leads to the existence of the knowledge of nature. The alienation of the concept can lead to the destruction of man and nature in practice. The result of the harmony, in the view of Marx, in the way of the practice, the way to grasp the natural process, always runs through the people and The value relation between man and nature is that people can meet the needs of people and meet the needs of people in the process of cognition and transformation of nature. The expression of the degree to which Marx holds that the human value of nature is realized in all the practice of man and nature. He proposed that the most basic value relation between man and nature is a value relation of utility, and in addition, the man and nature also In the view of the value of the relationship between man and nature, Marx put forward a famous conclusion In the evaluation of the value of human, Marx always insists on the social attribute of human nature, and puts forward that the social value is the appraiser's value. On the basis of this, Marx's value criticism on the relationship between the human and nature dissimilation in the existing capitalist society, the dissimilation of the cognition relation and the value relation of the alienation, and the practice relation, the understanding relation and the value relation of the ideal man and nature. On the basis of the value relation between man and nature, Marx also talked about the right of man and nature The relation of interest, that is, the relationship between the law and the right, is that Kant and Hegel are pursuing only the abstract method and the right, which is in the private Marx's criticism on the theory of the right of the bourgeoisie from the viewpoint of the social consciousness, the economic structure of the society and the superstructure of the society, and makes it clear that the property is" the whole content of the Act and the Sta " This paper reveals the essence of the right of law, subverts the legal basis of the metaphysical legal basis of the modern bourgeois law, and realizes the transcendence of the theory of the right of the bourgeoisie, and completes the right of law. On the basis of the revolutionary change in history, Marx makes a sharp criticism of the relationship between the human and nature of the realistic society of capitalism, and the relationship between the right of the man and nature of the ideal man and nature and the legal right to the ideal man and nature. The relationship between man and nature has always been developed with the development of human production, and its theory The nature of a distinctive dialectics. Dialectics is Mark. The methodology of the relationship between man and nature. In Marx, the dialectical relationship between man and nature is not only reflected in the interaction between man and nature as subject and object, especially in man Marx's transformation of Hegel's dialectics has made the revolution of Hegel's dialectics, and founded the dialectical thought of the unique practical materialism, and applied the thought consciously to it. In the theory of the relationship between man and nature, Marx has fully demonstrated its dialectical nature in the examination of the multiple relations of the ontology, the practice, the epistemology, the value of value and the theory of law, so as to reveal the man and nature. The historical dialectical characteristic of the relationship is the historical materialism of the theory through the multi-dimensional examination of the theory of the relationship between man and nature. In particular, the theory of the relationship between man and nature is realistic, idealistic, practical and revolutionary. The theory of the relationship between man and nature with its own characteristics is the theoretical basis for building the ecological philosophy of Chinese characteristics;
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:A811
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 俞吾金;;黑格尔精神认识论初探——重读《精神现象学》和《精神哲学》有感[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
2 文学平,周辉;创造丰富的人的感觉——马克思人的全面发展学说的一个维度[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2002年06期
3 朱哲;马晖慧;熊颖敏;;法权的尘世根基——马克思《黑格尔法哲学批判》对黑格尔法哲学体系的批判路径[J];湖北社会科学;2011年03期
4 邓晓芒;康德自由概念的三个层次[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
5 陈筠泉;;实践概念和哲学基本问题[J];高校理论战线;2010年03期
6 张彭松;;费尔巴哈哲学:马克思向实践本体论过渡的理论中介[J];湖南工程学院学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
7 杨庆茹;;真实的花朵——对马克思论艺术的掌握世界的方式的考察与阐释[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2007年08期
8 孟琦;;从“意识的异化”到“劳动的异化”——兼及黑格尔的异化理论及马克思对其之超越[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2007年10期
9 张金伟;;刍议费尔巴哈唯物主义认识论[J];黑河学刊;2010年02期
10 舒远招;论费尔巴哈对黑格尔哲学的批判[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2001年03期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 刘日明;近代法哲学与马克思的社会存在理论[D];复旦大学;2003年
2 郑玉明;试论黑格尔艺术认识范畴的实践性内涵[D];浙江大学;2004年
3 王福生;从思辨到革命——马克思对黑格尔辩证法的颠倒[D];吉林大学;2004年
4 王佳;马克思“生产实践论”研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
5 孙旭武;现实与逻辑——论马克思对黑格尔辩证法的颠倒及其意义[D];吉林大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 许恒兵;论马克思哲学的本体论革命[D];安徽师范大学;2006年
2 胡丹丹;试论马克思的实践本体论[D];西南政法大学;2007年
3 付文学;康德的法权哲学[D];安徽大学;2007年
4 李宁;发生认识论与马克思主义认识论的比较[D];河北大学;2010年
,本文编号:2493223
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2493223.html