“文化霸权”理论与群体意识形态关联研究

发布时间：2019-06-19 15:26

【摘要】：笔者在借助路易斯·阿尔都塞(Louis Althusser,1918-1990)的问题式(Problematic)研究范式考察葛兰西“文化霸权”与时代历史关联及“文化霸权”建构的基础上,通过思想与行动控制权这一中介,分析“文化霸权”与群体意识形态的内在关联。一方面,“文化霸权”与思想行动控制权以“同意”和“服从”为基础,内在地具有共通性关联；另一方面,群体意识形态内在地具有型塑思想与行动控制权的功能。因此,在总体意义,“文化霸权”与群体意识形之间具备特定的共通感关联,即二者都指向思想与行动控制权的型塑。在明确了“文化霸权”与群体意识形态的总体性关联的基础上,笔者基于既定意义上和动态生成意义两个角度,分别探讨“文化霸权”与群体意识形态的具体关联。在既定意义上,“文化霸权”与特定的群体意识形态之间具有以对抗性为主,同时彼此吸纳、涵摄的关联；在动态生成意义上,“文化霸权”的初生形态——智识道德的集团性统一,与特定的群体意识形态具有融合、涵摄及运动路径相似性的关联。因此,“文化霸权”与群体意识形态的内在关联表现为两个层次、三个方面：在总体层面,“文化霸权”与群体意识形态具有以思想行动控制权为基础的共通性关联；在具体层面,既定意义上的“文化霸权”与特定的群体意识形态具有以对抗性为主要内容的关联；在动态生成意义上,“文化霸权”与特定的群体意识形态具有融合、吸纳、涵摄及运动路径相似性的关联。在论题研究过程中,笔者还尝试性地作出与论题相关的自主探索研究。对“同意”与“服从”这一政治心理现象展开了类别研究：笔者认为,“同意”与“服从”包括诱导——认同、强制——服从和无意识同意这三种类型；对于群体意识形态这一特定的意识形态现象展开了其存在维度和特性的研究：笔者认为,群体意识形态就其存在维度而言,包括思想——本体维度和行为——实践维度。就其特性而言,群体意识形态除了具备境域性、公度性等特点之外,还具有扩张性特点。群体意识形态的存在维度自然延伸为对思想控制权与行动控制权的型塑。群体意识形态的扩张性既源于群体意识形态的基础——共同利益的扩张性,同时又源于群体意识形态内在功能——思想与行动控制权的型塑。群体意识形态的扩张性使其产生了特定的扩张运动,即由作为臣属状态的社会多元意识形态向作为具有社会统治地位和权威的社会一元主流意识形态的上升和扩张。在论题研究之外,笔者简要说明了“文化霸权”与群体意识形态内在关联的理论思辨研究对当下中国,共产党执政统治的现实意义。
[Abstract]:On the basis of investigating the relationship between Gramsci's "cultural hegemony" and the historical relationship of the times and the construction of "cultural hegemony" with the help of Louis Althusser,1918-1990 's problem (Problematic) research paradigm, the author analyzes the internal relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology through the intermediary of thought and action control. On the one hand, "cultural hegemony" and the control of thought and action are based on "consent" and "obedience", which are inherently related to each other; on the other hand, group ideology has the function of shaping thought and controlling action. Therefore, in the overall sense, there is a specific sense of common sense between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology, that is, both of them point to the shaping of the control right of thought and action. On the basis of defining the overall relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology, the author discusses the specific relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology from two angles: the established meaning and the dynamic generating meaning. In the established sense, there is a relationship between "cultural hegemony" and specific group ideology, which is mainly antagonistic, absorbed and contained by each other at the same time; in the sense of dynamic generation, the group unity of intellectual morality, the primary form of "cultural hegemony", is related to the integration of specific group ideology, including the similarity of movement path. Therefore, the internal relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology is manifested in two levels, three aspects: at the overall level, "cultural hegemony" and group ideology have a common relationship based on the control right of thought and action, at the specific level, "cultural hegemony" in the established sense is related to the specific group ideology with antagonism as the main content, and the relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology is based on the control of thought and action, and the relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology is based on the control of thought and action. In the sense of dynamic generation, "cultural hegemony" is related to the integration, absorption, inclusion and similarity of movement paths with specific group ideology. In the process of topic research, the author also tries to make independent exploration and research related to the topic. This paper studies the political psychological phenomena of "consent" and "obedience": the author believes that "consent" and "obedience" include three types: induction-identity, forced-obedience and unconscious consent; For the specific ideological phenomenon of group ideology, its existence dimension and characteristics are studied: the author believes that group ideology includes thought-ontology dimension and behavior-practice dimension as far as its existence dimension is concerned. As far as its characteristics are concerned, group ideology not only has the characteristics of localization and justice, but also has the characteristics of expansion. The existence dimension of group ideology naturally extends to the shaping of ideological control and action control. The expansion of group ideology originates not only from the expansion of common interests, which is the basis of group ideology, but also from the shaping of the internal function of group ideology, the control right of thought and action. The expansion of group ideology makes it produce a specific expansion movement, that is, the rise and expansion from the social pluralistic ideology as a subordinate state to the social unitary mainstream ideology with social dominance and authority. In addition to the research on the topic, the author briefly explains the practical significance of the theoretical speculative research on the internal relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology to the ruling rule of the Communist Party in China at present.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D252

【共引文献】